X-Sylpheed-Account-Id:1
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
X-Sylpheed-Encrypt:0
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E03E9A345@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 14:09:59 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Chris Vandever" <chris.vandever@onstor.com>
Cc: "Paul Hammer" <paul.hammer@onstor.com>, "Larry Scheer"
 <larry.scheer@onstor.com>, "Tim O'Callaghan" <tim.ocallaghan@onstor.com>,
 "dl-se" <dl-se@onstor.com>, "dl-cstech" <dl-cstech@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: quick question?
Message-ID: <20070914140959.2491af26@ripper.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E03E56FC0@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E03E9A345@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 10:42:01 -0700 "Chris Vandever"
<chris.vandever@onstor.com> wrote:

> Anyone doing a system copy all, which I believe we still recommend as
> part of system upgrade, will see it.
> 
>  
> 
> This was reported as the result of Delorean pre-release installations
> -- defect #19560.  Can we raise its priority and try to address it in
> Zonda, seeing as how it is still open 3 months later...  :(

Yeah, exactly, it's been around for 3 months and no one pays any
attention to it ... because the message clearly indicates that the
condition is to be ignored.
> 
> ChrisV
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Paul Hammer 
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 10:38 AM
> To: Larry Scheer; Tim O'Callaghan; dl-se
> Cc: dl-cstech
> Subject: RE: quick question?
> 
>  
> 
> This is okay as long as we do not get support calls to support about
> this. If this is something only our team will see we can live with it,
> if customers see it we need to fix ti.
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Larry Scheer
> Sent: Fri 9/14/2007 10:33 AM
> To: Tim O'Callaghan; dl-se
> Cc: dl-cstech
> Subject: RE: quick question?
> 
> No worries. Those partitions are part of the old flash lay out and are
> not created in the new layout. It is safe to ignore the "failed"
> message. The system copy all -i is converting your flash from the old
> layout to the new.
> 
>  
> 
> Larry Scheer
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Tim O'Callaghan 
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 6:39 AM
> To: dl-se
> Cc: dl-cstech
> Subject: quick question?
> 
>  
> 
> Should I be worried by the failure to make the filesystems on the
> last 2 partitions?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ONSTOR01> sys copy all -i
> 
> Secondary CF card is 502 MiB
> 
> Creating new disk label cf502.label
> 
> Writing the disk label...done
> 
> Making filesystem on /dev/rwd1a...done.
> 
> Making filesystem on /dev/rwd1d...done.
> 
> Making filesystem on /dev/rwd1e...done.
> 
> Making filesystem on /dev/rwd1f...done.
> 
> Making filesystem on /dev/rwd1g...failed -- ignoring.
> 
> Making filesystem on /dev/rwd1h...failed -- ignoring.
> 
>  
> 
> TIA
> 
>  
> 
> Tim
> 
>  
> 
> Tim O'Callaghan
> Senior S.E.
> 
> ONStor, Inc.
> office:  +44 1189 635866
> mobile: +44 7767 435472 
> 
> tim.ocallaghan@onstor.com <mailto:tim.ocallaghan@onstor.com> 
> http://www.onstor.com <http://www.onstor.com/> 
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
