X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C79998.605961A8@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Fri, 18 May 2007 15:03:33 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C79998.605961A8"
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E022157DF@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1
Date: Fri, 18 May 2007 15:02:42 -0700
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02F3D116@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1
Thread-Index: AceYsHsrZnWJEf4tT0S0LGSj6CYy0QAAufuAAAF1+6AAAy+7sAAJmZOQAAB74ZoAAKNbsAABshDrAB24R6AACEUwwAAA8ssLAACtlqAAAIlHRg==
From: "Ken Renshaw" <ken.renshaw@onstor.com>
To: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>,
	"Ed Kwan" <ed.kwan@onstor.com>,
	"Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
Cc: "Sandrine Boulanger" <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C79998.605961A8
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks a bunch for the concise list, Larry. Like I said I'll pull these =
change into the 2.2.x maintenance branch and build the submittal.

-Ken


-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Scheer
Sent: Fri 5/18/2007 3:01 PM
To: Ken Renshaw; Ed Kwan; Andy Sharp
Cc: Sandrine Boulanger
Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1
=20
Here is the complete list of changes and the files that were in the =
change lists.

23101 -- ssc-nfxsh/verify_install.sh
23306 -- sm-opt/fs.c sm-opt/opt-api.h ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c =
ssc-nfxsh/cmd_upgrade.c openbsd/src/etc/rc ssc-nfxsh/verify_install.sh
23307 -- openbsd/src/etc/mtree/4.4BSD.dist =
openbsd/src/usr.bin/gzip/Makefile
23349 -- nfx-tree/Makefile ssc-nfxsh/verify_install.sh
23359 -- ssc-nfxsh/verify_install.sh
23362 -- ssc-nfxsh/cmd_upgrade.c
23363 -- ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c
23495 -- ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c ssc-nfxsh/cmd_upgrade.c =
ssc-nfxsh/verify_install.sh
23503 -- ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c
23607 -- nfx-tree/Makefile Tools/flash_install.sh ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c =
ssc-nfxsh/cmd_upgrade.c
         openbsd/src/etc/Makefile openbsd/src/etc/mdrive_fstab =
openbsd/src/etc/old_mdrive_fstab openbsd/src/etc/rc
23608 -- etc/mdrive_fstab
23652 -- ssc-nfxsh/flash_install.sh ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c =
ssc-nfxsh/cmd_system.c
23715 -- ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c
23742 -- ssc-nfxsh/flash_install.sh openbsd/src/etc/rc
23839 -- ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c ssc-nfxsh/cmd_upgrade.c
23951 -- Tools/flash_install.sh openbsd/src/etc/rc.initial

Change 23607 also deleted some files which I did not list.

I still have a question about the integrate I'll ask that in another =
email message.

Larry

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Renshaw=20
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 2:28 PM
To: Larry Scheer; Ed Kwan; Andy Sharp
Cc: Sandrine Boulanger
Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1

Actually, when I pull changes I use the ...@x,@x notation which pulls =
just the delta for a particular change, not the whole file at a =
particular revision. If I just used ...@x to pull the whole file I could =
pull in changes in the file not destined for a particular patch.

I guess I either need the complete list of changelists, as Sandrine =
mentioned, or *maybe* you could give me a file list to pull the head or =
some other revisions on. Either way you'd like to do it is fine with me =
Larry. You're going to be doing the code review on it anyway ;)

I plan to build this on Monday, so as long as we have it ironed out by =
then we're good.

Thanks,

-Ken


-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Scheer
Sent: Fri 5/18/2007 2:24 PM
To: Ed Kwan; Andy Sharp
Cc: Ken Renshaw; Sandrine Boulanger
Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1
=20
I went through all of the change lists mentioned in this thread. Because =
Perforce changes are cumulative, if a file in an earlier change # was =
also modified in a later change # you only need to integrate the last =
change # for that file. (Ken, correct me if I am mistaken.) That is why =
the change numbers I provided did not match all of the changes listed in =
the defect list.=20

=20

On the other hand it was good that I did this exercise because I did =
leave out a few change lists. Here is the revised list:

=20

23306

23495

23607

23608

23652

23742

23839

23951

=20

One of the change lists mentioned in this thread is 23307 This change =
was made to get rid of /usr/local/info and the file: gzip.info from the =
distribution. It changes openbsd/src/etc/mtree/4.4BSD.dist and =
openbsd/src/gnu/usr.bin/gzip/Makefile. I am not sure how compatible the =
etc/mtree/4.4BSD.dist files are between 2.2.X and 3.0.0. If you want to =
pick up this change, watch the merge of this file.=20

=20

Larry

=20

________________________________

From: Ed Kwan=20
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 10:09 AM
To: Larry Scheer; Andy Sharp
Cc: Ken Renshaw; Sandrine Boulanger
Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1

=20

Hi Andy and Larry,

=20

Can you verify the list of p4 changes for upgrade and layout changes?

Here are the 2 emails I got from Larry, but Sandrine/Ken found quite a =
few more changes:

=20

Ken, Ed,

    The following change lists will give you the files to back-port the =
Upgrade and compact flash repartitioning features that are in Delorean. =
These changes are needed to give customers the ability to upgrade to =
Delorean and get the new compact flash layout.

=20

Change 23306 - Files that implement new compact flash layout and support =
upgrade with the layout.

Change 23359 - Fixes to verify_install.sh

Change 23362 - Changes to cmd_upgrade to run verify_install.sh from =
distribution

Change 23363 - Fix to quiet chatty system copy commands

=20

After this release is built we will need to rev the top level Makefile =
in the 2.2. Release tree to produce BOM files that are the new format, =
but not now. We only want to do this when this release is in the field.

=20

If you have any more questions don't hesitate to ask.

=20

Larry.

=20

And

=20

Add change # 23951

//depot/FB-DELOREAN/nfx-tree/Tools/flash_install.sh#6 edit

//depot/FB-DELOREAN/openbsd/src/etc/rc.initial#2 edit

=20

Larry

=20

=20

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Ken Renshaw

> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 7:53 PM

> To: Sandrine Boulanger; Ed Kwan

> Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1

>=20

> Can we get Larry and/or Andy to agree on the whole list before I =
start?

>=20

> Thanks,

>=20

> -Ken

>=20

>=20

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Sandrine Boulanger

> Sent: Thu 5/17/2007 7:13 PM

> To: Ken Renshaw; Ed Kwan

> Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1

>=20

>=20

>=20

> From Larry:

>=20

> 23306 for #17991 but in the defect are also listed p4 changes 23349,

> 23359, 23362

>=20

> 23607 for #18269,#18410,#18558,#18592

>=20

> 23608 for #18269

>=20

> 23652 for #18673

>=20

> 23742

>=20

> 23839 for #18880,18897,18298,19024

>=20

> 23951 for #19122

>=20

>=20

>=20

> Here is my additional list:

>=20

> 23349, 23359, 23362 from above for #17991

>=20

> 23715 for #18932

>=20

> 23101 for #17583 and 17990

>=20

> 23495 for #18372,18410,18506

>=20

> 23503 for #18533

>=20

> This one I'm no sure, it has to do with rc.agile, not sure if it's

> impacted by the above: 23921 for #19088

>=20

>=20

>=20

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Ken Renshaw

> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 6:46 PM

> To: Sandrine Boulanger; Ed Kwan

> Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1

>=20

>=20

>=20

> I, too, would ask Larry and Andy to notarize the list, if nothing else

> that to be able to say we built exactly what they asked for. I also

> expected a longer list than that.

>=20

>=20

>=20

> -Ken

>=20

>=20

>=20

>=20

>=20

> -----Original Message-----

>=20

> From: Sandrine Boulanger

>=20

> Sent: Thu 5/17/2007 6:34 PM

>=20

> To: Ed Kwan; Ken Renshaw

>=20

> Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1

>=20

>=20

>=20

> There must be more than those. I'm looking at the defects we filed in

> Delorean and check the p4 change (like for example #18932 and p4 =
change

> 23715).

>=20

> We can run the final list by Larry and Andy to make sure they apply, =
but

> since we found many problems in those areas, I want to make sure we =
don't

> miss any fix for 2.2.3

>=20

>=20

>=20

> -----Original Message-----

>=20

> From: Ed Kwan

>=20

> Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:45 PM

>=20

> To: Ken Renshaw; Larry Scheer

>=20

> Cc: Andy Sharp; Paul Hammer; Erik Palomba; Sandrine Boulanger

>=20

> Subject: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1

>=20

>=20

>=20

> Hi Ken,

>=20

>=20

>=20

> Please add the upgrade and CF layout changes to 2.2.3.  Here's the =
change

> list from Larry:

>=20

>=20

>=20

> 23306, 23607, 23608, 23652, 23742, 23839, 23951

>=20

>=20

>=20

> Thanks,

>=20

> Ed

>=20

>=20

>=20

> > -----Original Message-----

>=20

> > From: Paul Hammer

>=20

> > Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:52 PM

>=20

> > To: Ed Kwan; Andy Sharp

>=20

> > Cc: Larry Scheer; Ken Renshaw; Eric Barrett; Caeli Collins

>=20

> > Subject: RE: upgrade fixes in respun 1.3.3.16 patch

>=20

> >

>=20

> > Also talked to Jay about this one this morning, this change is not

> planned

>=20

> > for 133.x. We should move the customers to 2.x when we can and plan =
for

>=20

> > very little work to be done on the branch moving forward.

>=20

> >

>=20

> > We are going to take the 2 step upgrade piece in 223 as a support =
only

>=20

> > tool, agreed to this in the Delorean meeting today. Won't be tested =
and

>=20

> > won't be part of the docs.

>=20

>=20

>=20

>=20

>=20

=20




------_=_NextPart_001_01C79998.605961A8
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Thanks a bunch for the concise list, Larry. Like I =
said I'll pull these change into the 2.2.x maintenance branch and build =
the submittal.<BR>
<BR>
-Ken<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Larry Scheer<BR>
Sent: Fri 5/18/2007 3:01 PM<BR>
To: Ken Renshaw; Ed Kwan; Andy Sharp<BR>
Cc: Sandrine Boulanger<BR>
Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1<BR>
<BR>
Here is the complete list of changes and the files that were in the =
change lists.<BR>
<BR>
23101 -- ssc-nfxsh/verify_install.sh<BR>
23306 -- sm-opt/fs.c sm-opt/opt-api.h ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c =
ssc-nfxsh/cmd_upgrade.c openbsd/src/etc/rc =
ssc-nfxsh/verify_install.sh<BR>
23307 -- openbsd/src/etc/mtree/4.4BSD.dist =
openbsd/src/usr.bin/gzip/Makefile<BR>
23349 -- nfx-tree/Makefile ssc-nfxsh/verify_install.sh<BR>
23359 -- ssc-nfxsh/verify_install.sh<BR>
23362 -- ssc-nfxsh/cmd_upgrade.c<BR>
23363 -- ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c<BR>
23495 -- ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c ssc-nfxsh/cmd_upgrade.c =
ssc-nfxsh/verify_install.sh<BR>
23503 -- ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c<BR>
23607 -- nfx-tree/Makefile Tools/flash_install.sh ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c =
ssc-nfxsh/cmd_upgrade.c<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; =
openbsd/src/etc/Makefile openbsd/src/etc/mdrive_fstab =
openbsd/src/etc/old_mdrive_fstab openbsd/src/etc/rc<BR>
23608 -- etc/mdrive_fstab<BR>
23652 -- ssc-nfxsh/flash_install.sh ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c =
ssc-nfxsh/cmd_system.c<BR>
23715 -- ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c<BR>
23742 -- ssc-nfxsh/flash_install.sh openbsd/src/etc/rc<BR>
23839 -- ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash.c ssc-nfxsh/cmd_upgrade.c<BR>
23951 -- Tools/flash_install.sh openbsd/src/etc/rc.initial<BR>
<BR>
Change 23607 also deleted some files which I did not list.<BR>
<BR>
I still have a question about the integrate I'll ask that in another =
email message.<BR>
<BR>
Larry<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Ken Renshaw<BR>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 2:28 PM<BR>
To: Larry Scheer; Ed Kwan; Andy Sharp<BR>
Cc: Sandrine Boulanger<BR>
Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1<BR>
<BR>
Actually, when I pull changes I use the ...@x,@x notation which pulls =
just the delta for a particular change, not the whole file at a =
particular revision. If I just used ...@x to pull the whole file I could =
pull in changes in the file not destined for a particular patch.<BR>
<BR>
I guess I either need the complete list of changelists, as Sandrine =
mentioned, or *maybe* you could give me a file list to pull the head or =
some other revisions on. Either way you'd like to do it is fine with me =
Larry. You're going to be doing the code review on it anyway ;)<BR>
<BR>
I plan to build this on Monday, so as long as we have it ironed out by =
then we're good.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks,<BR>
<BR>
-Ken<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Larry Scheer<BR>
Sent: Fri 5/18/2007 2:24 PM<BR>
To: Ed Kwan; Andy Sharp<BR>
Cc: Ken Renshaw; Sandrine Boulanger<BR>
Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1<BR>
<BR>
I went through all of the change lists mentioned in this thread. Because =
Perforce changes are cumulative, if a file in an earlier change # was =
also modified in a later change # you only need to integrate the last =
change # for that file. (Ken, correct me if I am mistaken.) That is why =
the change numbers I provided did not match all of the changes listed in =
the defect list.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On the other hand it was good that I did this exercise because I did =
leave out a few change lists. Here is the revised list:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
23306<BR>
<BR>
23495<BR>
<BR>
23607<BR>
<BR>
23608<BR>
<BR>
23652<BR>
<BR>
23742<BR>
<BR>
23839<BR>
<BR>
23951<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
One of the change lists mentioned in this thread is 23307 This change =
was made to get rid of /usr/local/info and the file: gzip.info from the =
distribution. It changes openbsd/src/etc/mtree/4.4BSD.dist and =
openbsd/src/gnu/usr.bin/gzip/Makefile. I am not sure how compatible the =
etc/mtree/4.4BSD.dist files are between 2.2.X and 3.0.0. If you want to =
pick up this change, watch the merge of this file.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Larry<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
________________________________<BR>
<BR>
From: Ed Kwan<BR>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2007 10:09 AM<BR>
To: Larry Scheer; Andy Sharp<BR>
Cc: Ken Renshaw; Sandrine Boulanger<BR>
Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Hi Andy and Larry,<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Can you verify the list of p4 changes for upgrade and layout =
changes?<BR>
<BR>
Here are the 2 emails I got from Larry, but Sandrine/Ken found quite a =
few more changes:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Ken, Ed,<BR>
<BR>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; The following change lists will give you the files to =
back-port the Upgrade and compact flash repartitioning features that are =
in Delorean. These changes are needed to give customers the ability to =
upgrade to Delorean and get the new compact flash layout.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Change 23306 - Files that implement new compact flash layout and support =
upgrade with the layout.<BR>
<BR>
Change 23359 - Fixes to verify_install.sh<BR>
<BR>
Change 23362 - Changes to cmd_upgrade to run verify_install.sh from =
distribution<BR>
<BR>
Change 23363 - Fix to quiet chatty system copy commands<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
After this release is built we will need to rev the top level Makefile =
in the 2.2. Release tree to produce BOM files that are the new format, =
but not now. We only want to do this when this release is in the =
field.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
If you have any more questions don't hesitate to ask.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Larry.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
And<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Add change # 23951<BR>
<BR>
//depot/FB-DELOREAN/nfx-tree/Tools/flash_install.sh#6 edit<BR>
<BR>
//depot/FB-DELOREAN/openbsd/src/etc/rc.initial#2 edit<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Larry<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
&gt; -----Original Message-----<BR>
<BR>
&gt; From: Ken Renshaw<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 7:53 PM<BR>
<BR>
&gt; To: Sandrine Boulanger; Ed Kwan<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Can we get Larry and/or Andy to agree on the whole list before I =
start?<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Thanks,<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; -Ken<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; -----Original Message-----<BR>
<BR>
&gt; From: Sandrine Boulanger<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Sent: Thu 5/17/2007 7:13 PM<BR>
<BR>
&gt; To: Ken Renshaw; Ed Kwan<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; From Larry:<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23306 for #17991 but in the defect are also listed p4 changes =
23349,<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23359, 23362<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23607 for #18269,#18410,#18558,#18592<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23608 for #18269<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23652 for #18673<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23742<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23839 for #18880,18897,18298,19024<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23951 for #19122<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Here is my additional list:<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23349, 23359, 23362 from above for #17991<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23715 for #18932<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23101 for #17583 and 17990<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23495 for #18372,18410,18506<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23503 for #18533<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; This one I'm no sure, it has to do with rc.agile, not sure if =
it's<BR>
<BR>
&gt; impacted by the above: 23921 for #19088<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; -----Original Message-----<BR>
<BR>
&gt; From: Ken Renshaw<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 6:46 PM<BR>
<BR>
&gt; To: Sandrine Boulanger; Ed Kwan<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; I, too, would ask Larry and Andy to notarize the list, if nothing =
else<BR>
<BR>
&gt; that to be able to say we built exactly what they asked for. I =
also<BR>
<BR>
&gt; expected a longer list than that.<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; -Ken<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; -----Original Message-----<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; From: Sandrine Boulanger<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Sent: Thu 5/17/2007 6:34 PM<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; To: Ed Kwan; Ken Renshaw<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Subject: RE: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; There must be more than those. I'm looking at the defects we filed =
in<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Delorean and check the p4 change (like for example #18932 and p4 =
change<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23715).<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; We can run the final list by Larry and Andy to make sure they =
apply, but<BR>
<BR>
&gt; since we found many problems in those areas, I want to make sure we =
don't<BR>
<BR>
&gt; miss any fix for 2.2.3<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; -----Original Message-----<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; From: Ed Kwan<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 3:45 PM<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; To: Ken Renshaw; Larry Scheer<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Cc: Andy Sharp; Paul Hammer; Erik Palomba; Sandrine Boulanger<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Subject: maint patch 2.2.3 submittal 1<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Hi Ken,<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Please add the upgrade and CF layout changes to 2.2.3.&nbsp; Here's =
the change<BR>
<BR>
&gt; list from Larry:<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; 23306, 23607, 23608, 23652, 23742, 23839, 23951<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Thanks,<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Ed<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt; -----Original Message-----<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt; From: Paul Hammer<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt; Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 12:52 PM<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt; To: Ed Kwan; Andy Sharp<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt; Cc: Larry Scheer; Ken Renshaw; Eric Barrett; Caeli Collins<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt; Subject: RE: upgrade fixes in respun 1.3.3.16 patch<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt; Also talked to Jay about this one this morning, this change is =
not<BR>
<BR>
&gt; planned<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt; for 133.x. We should move the customers to 2.x when we can and =
plan for<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt; very little work to be done on the branch moving forward.<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt; We are going to take the 2 step upgrade piece in 223 as a =
support only<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt; tool, agreed to this in the Delorean meeting today. Won't be =
tested and<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt; &gt; won't be part of the docs.<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C79998.605961A8--
