X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C7989C.ECC9E0D4@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Thu, 17 May 2007 09:03:35 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: 2.2.2.5  w/n boot
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 09:03:35 -0700
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E03C0BF86@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E03C0BF7C@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: 2.2.2.5  w/n boot
Thread-Index: AceXyFGHaAMHX0y7RvaIs+G3KRP0owACV5LTAABqyEMABDU18AAAQurMAAE3k8QADAj6IAAAQCkQAAEUn30AHmW0UAAAswigAAA4R0A=
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E03C0BF55@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E03C0BF7C@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
From: "Rex Yuan" <rex.yuan@onstor.com>
To: "Erik Palomba" <erik.palomba@onstor.com>,
	"Raghu Murthy" <raghu.murthy@onstor.com>,
	"Ken Renshaw" <ken.renshaw@onstor.com>,
	"Danqing Jin" <danqing.jin@onstor.com>,
	"Ed Kwan" <ed.kwan@onstor.com>,
	"Huy Duong" <huy.duong@onstor.com>,
	"David Crispin" <david.crispin@onstor.com>,
	"Victor Carrell (Glasshouse)" <vcarrell@css.glasshouse.com>,
	"dl-cstech" <dl-cstech@onstor.com>
Cc: "Frontline Support" <support@cc.onstor.com>

1.3.3.16 has been pulled.

-----Original Message-----
From: Erik Palomba=20
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 8:57 AM
To: Raghu Murthy; Ken Renshaw; Danqing Jin; Ed Kwan; Huy Duong; David
Crispin; Victor Carrell (Glasshouse); dl-cstech
Subject: RE: 2.2.2.5 w/n boot

I just confirmed that 1.3.3.16 has the same problem as 2.2.2.5. Please
pull the patch.=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Raghu Murthy
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 8:43 AM
To: Ken Renshaw; Danqing Jin; Ed Kwan; Huy Duong; David Crispin; Victor
Carrell (Glasshouse); dl-cstech
Cc: Erik Palomba
Subject: RE: 2.2.2.5 w/n boot

Ken,

So do we have exposure on 1.3.3.16 as well?
Raghu
 ------------------
From: Alan Cooke (Glasshouse)
Sent: Thursday, May 17, 2007 5:37 AM
To: Alan Cooke (Glasshouse); dl-Customer-Engineering; Frontline Support;
dl-cstech
Subject: RE: Failure to boot OS may be in 1.3.3.16 too

Hi All,

Just confirmed this failure with trying to upgrade a Cheetah system in
the Glasshouse lab going from 1.3.3.14 to 1.3.3.16 We had to swap the CF
cards to get the system back.
This is a fairly conclusive failure so I would request this release is
removed from the FTP site ASAP please.

Thanks ... Alan.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Renshaw
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 6:06 PM
To: Danqing Jin; Raghu Murthy; Ed Kwan; Huy Duong; David Crispin; Victor
Carrell (Glasshouse); dl-cstech
Cc: Erik Palomba
Subject: Re: 2.2.2.5 w/n boot

Versions thru 2.2.2.4 do not have this issues.

-Ken

=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Danqing Jin
To: Raghu Murthy; Ken Renshaw; Ed Kwan; Huy Duong; David Crispin; Victor
Carrell (Glasshouse); dl-cstech
CC: Erik Palomba
Sent: Wed May 16 17:35:47 2007
Subject: RE: 2.2.2.5  w/n boot

They are safe, as this issue occurs only in 2.2.2.5.

________________________________

From: Raghu Murthy
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 5:35 PM
To: Ken Renshaw; Ed Kwan; Huy Duong; David Crispin; Victor Carrell
(Glasshouse); dl-cstech
Cc: Danqing Jin; Erik Palomba
Subject: RE: 2.2.2.5 w/n boot



I know we have yanked 2.2.2.5 from the FTP site. Since 2.2.2.5 was
failing the upgrade process while the others 2.2.2.3 and 2.2.2.4 did
not, any idea what is the exposure for the sites that successfully
upgraded to 2.2.2.3 and 2.2.2.4 but still have the incorrect /etc files?

=20

Raghu=20

=20

________________________________

From: Ken Renshaw=20
Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 11:44 AM
To: Ken Renshaw; Ed Kwan; Huy Duong; David Crispin; Victor Carrell
(Glasshouse); dl-cstech
Cc: Danqing Jin; Erik Palomba
Subject: RE: 2.2.2.5 w/n boot

=20

From now on I will add a step in the build process for patches to do a
quick file delta from the previous patch and include that in the build
info. Hopefully that will help us flag these kinds of things before they
leave the building.

=20

Thanks,

=20

-Ken

=20

________________________________

From: Ken Renshaw
Sent: Wed 5/16/2007 11:37 AM
To: Ed Kwan; Huy Duong; David Crispin; Victor Carrell (Glasshouse);
dl-cstech
Cc: Danqing Jin; Erik Palomba; Ken Renshaw
Subject: RE: 2.2.2.5 w/n boot

Hello.

=20

The last four patches have all been done with the same build of bsd:

=20

[build@k2 Build-Trees]$ strings
R2.2.2.3/R2.2.2.3-041807/nfx-tree/Build/bc/opt/Release/bsd | grep
OpenBSD| grep BOBCAT
    @(#)OpenBSD 2.8 (BOBCAT) #0: Thu Jan 18 13:34:43 PST 2007
[build@k2 Build-Trees]$ strings
R2.2.2.4/R2.2.2.4-042507/nfx-tree/Build/bc/opt/Release/bsd | grep
OpenBSD| grep BOBCAT
    @(#)OpenBSD 2.8 (BOBCAT) #0: Thu Jan 18 13:34:43 PST 2007
[build@k2 Build-Trees]$ strings
R2.2.2.5/R2.2.2.5-043007/nfx-tree/Build/bc/opt/Release/bsd | grep
OpenBSD| grep BOBCAT
    @(#)OpenBSD 2.8 (BOBCAT) #0: Thu Jan 18 13:34:43 PST 2007
[build@k2 Build-Trees]$ strings
R2.2.2.6/R2.2.2.6-051407/nfx-tree/Build/bc/opt/Release/bsd | grep
OpenBSD| grep BOBCAT
    @(#)OpenBSD 2.8 (BOBCAT) #0: Thu Jan 18 13:34:43 PST 2007

=20

This is not a matter of using the wrong BSD to package the patch. It's a
case of someone corrupting the posted BSD images, probably by doing a p4
sync when /usr/openbsd.new was pointed to the 2.2.x BSD when they
thought it was pointed to DeLorean.=20

=20

In the Notes section of CQ 19207 Danqing does a compare of the two files
/etc/rc and /etc/mdrive_fstab and found they had parts of recent
DeLorean changes grafted into them. These same pieces are in the posted
BSD build for 2.2.x:

=20

/n/Build-Trees/BSD/openbsd-latest-22

=20

I believe all we have to do to fix this is copy the correct 2.2.x /etc
files into the posted 2.2.x BSD build and rebuild the patch tarfiles.
Ed, you'd said spin 2.2.2.5 as 2.2.2.7, but isn't what we want to do is
respin 2.2.2.6 as 2.2.2.7 with the corrected /etc files so they stay
cumulative?

=20

Please confirm, then I'll go ahead and do this.

=20

Thanks,

=20

-Ken

=20

________________________________

From: Ed Kwan
Sent: Wed 5/16/2007 11:05 AM
To: Huy Duong; David Crispin; Victor Carrell (Glasshouse); dl-cstech
Cc: Ken Renshaw; Danqing Jin; Erik Palomba
Subject: RE: 2.2.2.5 w/n boot

TED 19207.  Need to re-spin 2.2.2.5 (as 2.2.2.7) with the correct BSD.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Huy Duong
> Sent: Wednesday, May 16, 2007 9:01 AM
> To: David Crispin; Victor Carrell (Glasshouse); dl-cstech
> Subject: Re: 2.2.2.5 w/n boot
>
> Victor file a bug. This is very serious I will escalate it.
> -----------------------------------------
> Huy Duong
> ONStor Strategic Support Account Manager
> Phone 408.963.2478
> Cell    408.431.6803
> http://support.onstor.com/
> Sent From My Blackberry
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Crispin
> To: Victor Carrell (Glasshouse); dl-cstech
> Sent: Wed May 16 08:48:45 2007
> Subject: Re: 2.2.2.5  w/n boot
>
> I had the same thing yesterday. System upgrade, compare then reboot -s
and
> it never came back. This was in a remote data centre. A real pain.
It's
> still down.
>
> Regards,
> David Crispin
> Technical Services Manager
> ONStor Ltd.
> 07940 547895
>
> Sent from my Blackberry
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Victor Carrell (Glasshouse)
> To: dl-cstech
> Sent: Wed May 16 07:41:42 2007
> Subject: 2.2.2.5  w/n boot
>
> Hi All,
>
>
>
>             Can some one tell me the super secret step needed to boot
a
> 22xx 2.2.2.5 after an upgrade?
>
>
>
> We tried upgrading LA Health yesterday 2 systems 1 system twice.
> Everything runs clean compare, md5 and version -s ok but will not boot
>
>
>
> I tried the same upgrade from a local ftp server to our systems
in-house
> w/same results.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Victor

