X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C78314.2E41BCD7@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:21:50 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Clarification: Defect  TED00018673 system copy command failed for admin user
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 23:20:47 -0700
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0351C17D@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070419190831.6f499877@ripper.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Clarification: Defect  TED00018673 system copy command failed for admin user
thread-index: AceC8Mt6SgW0rtCTRIauBiozrtJzkQAIzZKg
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0351BB80@onstor-exch02.onstor.net><BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0351C112@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <20070419190831.6f499877@ripper.onstor.net>
From: "Brian DeForest" <brian.deforest@onstor.com>
To: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
Cc: "Yuvarani Cothandaraman" <yuvarani.cothandaraman@onstor.com>

You can just reassign it to yourself.   Thanks.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Sharp=20
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 7:09 PM
To: Brian DeForest
Cc: Yuvarani Cothandaraman
Subject: Re: Clarification: Defect TED00018673 system copy command
failed for admin user

It's a bug.  If that is the defect #, I've already got the code to fix
it, so just assign it to me.

Sigh,

a


 On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 18:19:31 -0700 "Brian DeForest"
<brian.deforest@onstor.com> wrote:

> Please check that this is not a permissions problem.   Note that admin
> doesn't have root access, so it might be necessary to become_root(),
> though I haven't had time to look at the code.  =20
> _____________________________________________
> From: Yuvarani Cothandaraman=20
> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 6:19 AM
> To: Brian DeForest
> Subject: Clarification: Defect TED00018673 system copy command failed
> for admin user=20
>=20
> Brian,
>    On analysis of this defect, looks like this defect is due to code
> changes in cmd_flash.c.
>=20
> In could be a side effect of the enhancements given for TED00017283.
> (changelist 23306)
>=20
> Request your inputs if the defect 17283 can be re-opened.
>=20
> Regards,
> Yuva.
