X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C73B3C.768FB5D8@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:08:47 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C73B3C.768FB5D8"
References: <WEBMAILj43i7pwKuX9a00000de9@mail.onstor.com> <20070118120124.671f75ad@ripper.onstor.net>
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: PERFORCE change 22433 for review
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 12:07:00 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0A9113@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: PERFORCE change 22433 for review
thread-index: Acc7O26MDHg+AdDWSL+5leYNSTh+fQAAMfxR
From: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
To: "Andrew Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C73B3C.768FB5D8
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Ken usually does the updating of one branch to another but developers =
can also do it if they are in a hurry. I usually give a courtesy notice =
to Ken when I merge code between branches. It is just one less merge Ken =
will have to do.

Larry


-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Sharp [mailto:andy.sharp@onstor.com]
Sent: Thu 1/18/2007 12:01 PM
To: Larry Scheer
Cc: Tim Gardner
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 22433 for review
=20
Larry,

Can you integrate this CL and 22434 to Delorean?  Is that allowed?
What's the procedure here?  I never see any engineers doing this, but I
need to develop against these changes in delorean, and I don't want to
wait a month.  Is the procedure to ask ken to integrate them or ???

Cheers,

a


On 18 Jan 2007 02:00:52 -0800 Larry Scheer
<larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:

> Change 22433 by larrys@larrys-r14-dmip on 2007/01/18 01:47:43
>=20
> 	Fixes for defects # 17232, 16894, 16471. Upgrade problems.
> 	This changes the way the upgrade command works. It now uses
> less memory by not extracting all files in the distribution archive
> into ramfs. Instead the distribution archive is put into ramfs by the
> ftp command and then the script verify_install figures out what files
> need upgrading and extracts those files from the distribution and
> installs them onto the compact flash. Old manifest files (*.bom) are
> removed from /usr/local/agile/conf. (defect # 17232)
> 	Reviewed by: andys
>=20
> Affected files ...
>=20
> ... //depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/descr#2 edit
> ... //depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/descr-bc#2 edit
> ... //depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/nfx-tree/Makefile#4 edit
> ... //depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/nfx-tree/code/ssc-nfxsh/Makefile#6 edit
> ... //depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/nfx-tree/code/ssc-nfxsh/cmd_upgrade.c#5
> edit ... =
//depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/nfx-tree/code/ssc-nfxsh/verify_install.sh#1
> add
>=20


------_=_NextPart_001_01C73B3C.768FB5D8
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7650.28">
<TITLE>RE: PERFORCE change 22433 for review</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Ken usually does the updating of one branch to another =
but developers can also do it if they are in a hurry. I usually give a =
courtesy notice to Ken when I merge code between branches. It is just =
one less merge Ken will have to do.<BR>
<BR>
Larry<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Andrew Sharp [<A =
HREF=3D"mailto:andy.sharp@onstor.com">mailto:andy.sharp@onstor.com</A>]<B=
R>
Sent: Thu 1/18/2007 12:01 PM<BR>
To: Larry Scheer<BR>
Cc: Tim Gardner<BR>
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 22433 for review<BR>
<BR>
Larry,<BR>
<BR>
Can you integrate this CL and 22434 to Delorean?&nbsp; Is that =
allowed?<BR>
What's the procedure here?&nbsp; I never see any engineers doing this, =
but I<BR>
need to develop against these changes in delorean, and I don't want =
to<BR>
wait a month.&nbsp; Is the procedure to ask ken to integrate them or =
???<BR>
<BR>
Cheers,<BR>
<BR>
a<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On 18 Jan 2007 02:00:52 -0800 Larry Scheer<BR>
&lt;larry.scheer@onstor.com&gt; wrote:<BR>
<BR>
&gt; Change 22433 by larrys@larrys-r14-dmip on 2007/01/18 01:47:43<BR>
&gt;<BR>
&gt; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Fixes for defects # 17232, 16894, =
16471. Upgrade problems.<BR>
&gt; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; This changes the way the upgrade =
command works. It now uses<BR>
&gt; less memory by not extracting all files in the distribution =
archive<BR>
&gt; into ramfs. Instead the distribution archive is put into ramfs by =
the<BR>
&gt; ftp command and then the script verify_install figures out what =
files<BR>
&gt; need upgrading and extracts those files from the distribution =
and<BR>
&gt; installs them onto the compact flash. Old manifest files (*.bom) =
are<BR>
&gt; removed from /usr/local/agile/conf. (defect # 17232)<BR>
&gt; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Reviewed by: andys<BR>
&gt;<BR>
&gt; Affected files ...<BR>
&gt;<BR>
&gt; ... //depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/descr#2 edit<BR>
&gt; ... //depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/descr-bc#2 edit<BR>
&gt; ... //depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/nfx-tree/Makefile#4 edit<BR>
&gt; ... //depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/nfx-tree/code/ssc-nfxsh/Makefile#6 =
edit<BR>
&gt; ... =
//depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/nfx-tree/code/ssc-nfxsh/cmd_upgrade.c#5<BR>
&gt; edit ... =
//depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/nfx-tree/code/ssc-nfxsh/verify_install.sh#1<BR>
&gt; add<BR>
&gt;<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C73B3C.768FB5D8--
