X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C7812D.CA5EE63D@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:20:07 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: please review
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:20:07 -0700
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0221573D@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070417120314.0297190a@ripper.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: please review
Thread-Index: AceBIw017bVF+GkwQeOZV3nqFtunNwACUeEw
From: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
To: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>

Line 1144 cmd_flash.c removing /onstor/conf/.fresh-flash .vs
/onstor/.fresh-flash.

That is all that I found.=20

The rest looks good.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Sharp=20
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:03 PM
To: Larry Scheer
Subject: please review

Hi Larry,

I know you reviewed most of these files already, but cmd_upgrade.c and
cmd_flash.c have changed since then so I would be grateful if you could
give them the once over.  I'm especially nervous about the latest
change that re-assigns that function variable cur_true_name.

changelist 23496 client ripper

Are you able to review these difference w/o logging into ripper?
That's the goal, but I was confused the other day that I had to log
into linux-compile when I haven't had to do that with some other
clients, and I'm just not sure what the difference is.

Cheers,

a
