X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C770C8.1CEA55DB@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:31:58 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: code review for CF upgrades
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 16:29:07 -0700
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E030862A6@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070327161926.40765648@ripper.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: code review for CF upgrades
Thread-Index: AcdwxlygK3d+sV8LRfKgfYJKt8RqpQAAKFow
References: <20070327114052.1af1c812@ripper.onstor.net><BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E03086106@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <20070327161926.40765648@ripper.onstor.net>
From: "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
To: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>


> 199: why swap should be 6%?

You may choose:
	a) because I said so
	b) why not?
	c) you had your chance to ask that question in the review
meeting d) all of the above

We are not using it the swap, the only reason it is there is because I
could not make the damn thing boot without the swap and never got back
to fixing it. Swap should be as small as possible. We should try to
configure it without swap on Linux. 6% of 1GB is 64MB - looks like a lot
of waste.
