X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C73365.9DB63A0C@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:43:13 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: PERFORCE change 22320 for review
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2007 12:43:13 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0A945E@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070108120732.21c60e63@ripper.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: PERFORCE change 22320 for review
thread-index: AcczYKIOhqtGOiOCRGqzP0O656XpwgABCllg
From: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
To: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>,
	"James Kahn" <james.kahn@onstor.com>

James should give you the gory details. I hope I don't mis-speak in my
terse explanation.
Ra is a function macro that is machine code and was used as a parameter
in a function call as (void *) ra. The compiler thought ra was unused in
the program. Adding unused__ in the function prototype definition made
the compiler happy.

-----Original Message-----
From: Andrew Sharp [mailto:andy.sharp@onstor.com]=20
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12:08 PM
To: James Kahn
Cc: Larry Scheer
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 22320 for review

Hi Guys,

Can I get more info on this?  What is the nature of the compiler bug,
why does this solve it, etc.

Thanks

a



On 5 Jan 2007 17:27:55 -0800 James Kahn <james.kahn@onstor.com> wrote:

> Change 22320 by jamesk@jamesk-work2.2.1 on 2007/01/05 17:17:17
>=20
> 	Fixed opt build compiler bug...marked ra as unused__.
> 	Reviewed by larrys.
>=20
> Affected files ...
>=20
> ... //depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/nfx-tree/code/sm-rmc/rmc.c#4 edit
>=20
