X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C7D54E.E5E4BB80@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:48:44 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Please review
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 13:48:41 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E04DF9726@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Please review
Thread-Index: AcfVTgVbXv4b1yV/TvCdNUabQdXFVQAAC5kwAAAkVbA=
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E04D200F3@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <20070802144227.44d81985@ripper.onstor.net> 
From: "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
To: "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>,
	"Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>

Ok, you are right, I did not intend to change the callers. Changed the
callers back to call the original=20

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Maxim Kozlovsky
>Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 2:45 PM
>To: Andy Sharp
>Subject: RE: Please review
>
>
>>nfx-tree/code/ssc-authentication/auth-cifs.c
>>
>>     why bother to convert set_fd_block() to use the new api function
>>     if you are then just going to change all the places it was called
>>     to use the new api function?  can't you just remove
set_fd_block()?
>[MK]
>It does some error reporting which may occasionally be useful (that is
how
>I found that it does not work).

