X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C72F84.28615456@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:11:46 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: How to restore from a snapshot directory via CIFs  DOS
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 14:11:45 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E01E2CA66@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E01E2CA0E@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: How to restore from a snapshot directory via CIFs  DOS
thread-index: AccvfXoFDixL1mdDS2muUIQR2lrk7gAAD8owAAGZ/RA=
From: "Eric Barrett" <eric.barrett@onstor.com>
To: "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>,
	"Michael Tracy" <mtracy@css.glasshouse.com>,
	"dl-cstech" <dl-cstech@onstor.com>

Mike, I stand corrected!

Added to the wiki:
http://wiki.onstor.net/wiki/CIFS_FAQ#Is_the_.snapshot_directory_availabl
e_in_CIFS.3F

=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Maxim Kozlovsky=20
Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 1:29 PM
To: Michael Tracy; dl-cstech
Subject: RE: How to restore from a snapshot directory via CIFs DOS

There is .snapshot in CIFS, it is invisible when the directory is
listed, but it is accessible if addressed directly.
The 8.3 name for ".snapshot" is "~snapsht". =20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Tracy [mailto:mtracy@css.glasshouse.com]=20
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2007 1:24 PM
> To: dl-cstech
> Subject: How to restore from a snapshot directory via CIFs DOS
>=20
> Strategic Discovery
> 4208
>=20
> Customer has snapshots set up and he would like to map the=20
> snapshot to restore from it.
> It seems there is no .snapshot directory to cifs you need to=20
> look in the file history right-click, pick properties, and=20
> then look for the "previous versions" tab
>=20
> He wants to be able to restore via RoboCopy so he's looking=20
> for a DOS equivalent.
>=20
> Does anyone know of a workaround to allow this to happen?
>=20
> Michael
>=20
>=20
>=20
