X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C7D2C3.2B2F4AB0@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:03:28 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Please review
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:03:28 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E04AFAFFD@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070727180743.2fedd83d@ripper.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Please review
Thread-Index: AcfQs7PXX7dkI+NURGuW3hdVcc8NFACDvP0g
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E04AFA1BD@onstor-exch02.onstor.net><20070725124634.3cb7ad81@ripper.onstor.net><BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E04AFA243@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <20070727180743.2fedd83d@ripper.onstor.net>
From: "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
To: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>

>> >nfx-tree/code/ssc-ifconfig/ssc-ifc-linux.c
>> >
>> >     what's wrong with the way it was being done, which didn't
>> >     require adding an extra two packages, one of which we kinda
>> >     don't want: libatm1 ?
>> [MK]
>> It did not work and required a bunch of code which is identical to
>> what the existing utility does.
>>
>> iproute does not require libatm1.
>
>Huh?
>
>$ apt-cache show iproute
>Package: iproute
>Priority: optional
>Section: net
>Installed-Size: 660
>Maintainer: Alexander Wirt <formorer@debian.org>
>Architecture: amd64
>Version: 20061002-3
>Provides: arpd
>Depends: libatm1, libc6 (>=3D 2.3.5-1), libdb4.3 (>=3D 4.3.28-1)
>Recommends: iproute-doc
>Conflicts: arpd
>.

[MK]=20
I've downloaded the source and built it, it did built fine without
libatm1. If you look at the ~maximk/iproute-20061002/configure, it
checks for the presence of libatm1 and if it is not there, configures to
build without it. There should be prebuilt version around which does not
require libatm1.
