X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C7B738.B22E44BC@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Mon, 25 Jun 2007 06:54:13 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7B738.B22E44BC"
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E031D88A7@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E031D88A8@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0443A886@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Checkin of neteee protocol #2
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 06:54:13 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E032587E6@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Checkin of neteee protocol #2
Thread-Index: Ace1B1l0tCI+5M6lT+qnlwyQaeQlTgABR71QAABSHYAAin/LMQ==
From: "Richard Beck" <IMCEAEX-_O=ONSTOR_OU=FIRST+20ADMINISTRATIVE+20GROUP_CN=RECIPIENTS_CN=RICHARD+2EBECK@onstor.com>
To: "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
Cc: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>,
	"Tim Gardner" <tim.gardner@onstor.com>,
	<richbeck57@yahoo.com>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C7B738.B22E44BC
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

The code was cleaned up per your request, and tested on Bobcat eng216 =
before I left.
Please feel free to contact me with any questions.
Best regards,
--Rich


-----Original Message-----
From: Maxim Kozlovsky
Sent: Fri 6/22/2007 1:52 PM
To: Richard Beck
Cc: Andy Sharp; Tim Gardner
Subject: RE: Checkin of neteee protocol #2
=20
There is a bunch of code there that has nothing to do with what we need =
to have for #2, and looks wrong, like sendmsg, recvmsg, neteee_rcv, etc. =
Can we have only the code that is relevant to the problem and works?


There is no need to add SOCK_EEE, eee sockets should be of type =
SOCK_DGRAM.

_____________________________________________
From: Richard Beck=20
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 1:35 PM
To: Maxim Kozlovsky
Cc: Andy Sharp; Tim Gardner
Subject: RE: Checkin of neteee protocol #2

Hold off for just a minute.  I found a header file that is required but =
not part of the changelist, and at least one unnecessary include in =
neteee.c
I'll have them fixed in about 5 minutes, and notify you then.
--Rich

_____________________________________________
From: Richard Beck=20
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 12:56 PM
To: Maxim Kozlovsky
Cc: Andy Sharp; Tim Gardner
Subject: Checkin of neteee protocol #2

Max,

The version of neteee requested in item 2 is tested and available for =
your review in:

Changelilst:  24337
Client:	       richardb-linux

I expect to have an update which covers items 3 and 4 available today as =
well.

--Rich


------_=_NextPart_001_01C7B738.B22E44BC
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>RE: Checkin of neteee protocol #2</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>The code was cleaned up per your request, and tested =
on Bobcat eng216 before I left.<BR>
Please feel free to contact me with any questions.<BR>
Best regards,<BR>
--Rich<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Maxim Kozlovsky<BR>
Sent: Fri 6/22/2007 1:52 PM<BR>
To: Richard Beck<BR>
Cc: Andy Sharp; Tim Gardner<BR>
Subject: RE: Checkin of neteee protocol #2<BR>
<BR>
There is a bunch of code there that has nothing to do with what we need =
to have for #2, and looks wrong, like sendmsg, recvmsg, neteee_rcv, etc. =
Can we have only the code that is relevant to the problem and works?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
There is no need to add SOCK_EEE, eee sockets should be of type =
SOCK_DGRAM.<BR>
<BR>
_____________________________________________<BR>
From: Richard Beck<BR>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 1:35 PM<BR>
To: Maxim Kozlovsky<BR>
Cc: Andy Sharp; Tim Gardner<BR>
Subject: RE: Checkin of neteee protocol #2<BR>
<BR>
Hold off for just a minute.&nbsp; I found a header file that is required =
but not part of the changelist, and at least one unnecessary include in =
neteee.c<BR>
I'll have them fixed in about 5 minutes, and notify you then.<BR>
--Rich<BR>
<BR>
_____________________________________________<BR>
From: Richard Beck<BR>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2007 12:56 PM<BR>
To: Maxim Kozlovsky<BR>
Cc: Andy Sharp; Tim Gardner<BR>
Subject: Checkin of neteee protocol #2<BR>
<BR>
Max,<BR>
<BR>
The version of neteee requested in item 2 is tested and available for =
your review in:<BR>
<BR>
Changelilst:&nbsp; 24337<BR>
Client: &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; richardb-linux<BR>
<BR>
I expect to have an update which covers items 3 and 4 available today as =
well.<BR>
<BR>
--Rich<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C7B738.B22E44BC--
