X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C7B457.316B0467@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:54:58 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Delorean Wraup Up Report
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2007 14:54:45 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0443A49D@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0443A34A@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Delorean Wraup Up Report
Thread-Index: Aceu4ZySPhf98U60Q7SyVG56mh2nNQFMDQAnAAUr+dAAAGKcPwAFT3WAAABvWDoAAQyeUAAE2fqQ
From: "Sandeep Randhawa" <sandeep.randhawa@onstor.com>
To: "Bob Miller" <bob.miller@onstor.com>,
	"Raghu Murthy" <raghu.murthy@onstor.com>,
	"Raj Kumar" <raj.kumar@onstor.com>
Cc: "Andrew LeFebvre" <andrew.lefebvre@onstor.com>,
	"dl-Executive" <dl-exec@onstor.com>,
	"dl-eng-ops-staff" <dl-eng-ops-staff@onstor.com>,
	"dl-Delorean Core Team" <dl-DeloreanCoreTeam@onstor.com>,
	"Kevin Matthews" <kevin.matthews@onstor.com>,
	"dl-Delorean" <dl-Delorean@onstor.com>,
	"Sudheesh Nair" <sudheesh.nair@onstor.com>

IMHO the minor + mini + limit testing are all MAJOR. There is no minor
for us in the field.

Fro e.g. SNMP 'minor' no way :-).

It's important to keep a prospective of minor/major from a customer view
point as well (I understand we see it from the internal effort point of
view). 15000 man hours - wow.

Thanks a lot!!!

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Miller=20
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 1:33 PM
To: Raghu Murthy; Raj Kumar
Cc: Andrew LeFebvre; dl-Executive; dl-eng-ops-staff; dl-Delorean Core
Team; Kevin Matthews; dl-Delorean; Sudheesh Nair
Subject: RE: Delorean Wraup Up Report

Very good we have to make sure that we are giving the customer the best
advice possible.
B

-----Original Message-----
From: Raghu Murthy=20
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 1:02 PM
To: Bob Miller; Raj Kumar
Cc: Andrew LeFebvre; dl-Executive; dl-eng-ops-staff; dl-Delorean Core
Team; Kevin Matthews; dl-Delorean; Sudheesh Nair
Subject: Re: Delorean Wraup Up Report


You bet, Bob. I am looking out for CS in the Core Team.

Raghu

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Miller
To: Raj Kumar
CC: Andrew LeFebvre; dl-Executive; dl-eng-ops-staff; dl-Delorean Core
Team; Kevin Matthews; dl-Delorean; Sudheesh Nair
Sent: Thu Jun 21 12:50:09 2007
Subject: RE: Delorean Wraup Up Report

Raj

Very good, I assume this will also include L3 support people.

B

=20

From: Raj Kumar=20
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 10:17 AM
To: Bob Miller
Cc: Andrew LeFebvre; dl-Executive; dl-eng-ops-staff; dl-Delorean Core
Team; Kevin Matthews; dl-Delorean; Sudheesh Nair
Subject: RE: Delorean Wraup Up Report

=20

Bob,

=20

We have a Delorean TOI scheduled tomorrow and all of these information
are transferred to SE's and other non engineering folks in that TOI
session. TOI materials will also be posted in mightydog for future
references.

=20

Thanks.

=20

________________________________

From: Bob Miller
Sent: Thu 6/21/2007 10:08 AM
To: Raj Kumar
Cc: Andrew LeFebvre; dl-Executive; dl-eng-ops-staff; dl-Delorean Core
Team; Kevin Matthews; dl-Delorean; Sudheesh Nair
Subject: RE: Delorean Wraup Up Report

Raj

This is an excellent report. How will this information be communicated
to the SEs relative to the limits that QE is comfortable supporting as
well as both the fixed and remaining MF defects?

Bob

=20

From: Raj Kumar=20
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2007 7:45 AM
To: Andrew LeFebvre; dl-Executive; dl-eng-ops-staff; dl-Delorean Core
Team; Kevin Matthews; dl-Delorean
Subject: Delorean Wraup Up Report

=20

Hi,

=20

On behalf of the Delorean team I like to submit the Delorean project
wrap up report.

=20

\\mightydog\qe\Projects\delorean\Delorean-Wrap-Up-Report.doc
<file:///\\mightydog\qe\Projects\delorean\Delorean-Wrap-Up-Report.doc>=20

=20

Thanks.

=20

--kumar :)

=20

=20

=20

________________________________

From: Andrew LeFebvre
Sent: Thu 6/14/2007 5:10 PM
To: dl-Executive; dl-eng-ops-staff; dl-Delorean Core Team; Kevin
Matthews
Subject: Minutes from 6/14 Delorean FCS Review

All,

Thanks to everyone who participated in today's Delorean FCS Review
(Phase 3 Exit)!  The unanimous decision is for Delorean to FCS
immediately and RTM as soon as the gold master and copies can be created
and verified (either tomorrow or on Monday).  The GA date and whether or
not this is a mandatory upgrade will be decided by CS and others in the
next couple of weeks based on customer uptake and code stability.

Use the following link to review the presentation material:

\\mightydog\Program Management\Delorean\Phase Reviews\FCS Review\FCS
Review Agenda 6-14-07.ppt
<file:///\\mightydog\Program%20Management\Delorean\Phase%20Reviews\FCS%2
0Review\FCS%20Review%20Agenda%206-14-07.ppt>=20

Here are the actions/comments I took down. =20

	1.	QA testing of increased numbers of volumes should begin
now rather than being tied to the Zonda release.  Getting to 50 volumes
can be an intermediate milestone to getting to 100.=20

	2.	Caeli to use EMRS to determine how many customers have
volumes greater than 32 TB.=20

	3.	Needs to be some discussion about how best (or if) to
package QE limits testing results for SE, CS, Sales, and customers.=20

	4.	Andy to develop a quantitative metric for commitments
vs. deliverables that can be used to compare projects.  Share this in
the post mortem review.=20

	5.	CS and SE need to review the Kerberos upgrade procedure
documentation and let DEV know if they have any questions or concerns.=20

=20

Please respond to all on this e-mail if you have any additions or
clarifications.

=20

Regards,

Andy

