X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C7ADE1.C3F8CE85@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:39:17 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7ADE1.C3F8CE85"
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02EB2EA7@onstor-exch02.onstor.net><BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02F3D26A@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <20070613103335.78228ce7@ripper.onstor.net> <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02F3D273@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E041BFDF2@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Perforce back online - Was: RE: something wrong with p4
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2007 09:38:57 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02F3D274@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Perforce back online - Was: RE: something wrong with p4
Thread-Index: Acet4PjKX8tcL+OwQByXSw/LlbOelwAACge4AAAMqDAAABkx2A==
From: "Ken Renshaw" <ken.renshaw@onstor.com>
To: "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>,
	"Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
Cc: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C7ADE1.C3F8CE85
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Sure, if he wants the blame too ;)


-----Original Message-----
From: Maxim Kozlovsky
Sent: Wed 6/13/2007 10:37 AM
To: Ken Renshaw; Andy Sharp
Cc: Larry Scheer
Subject: RE: Perforce back online - Was: RE: something wrong with p4
=20
I think Andy is trying to volunteer for the job of p4 administrator. =
Should we let him do it from now on?

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Renshaw=20
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 10:35 AM
To: Andy Sharp
Cc: Maxim Kozlovsky; Larry Scheer
Subject: RE: Perforce back online - Was: RE: something wrong with p4

Lesson learned the hard way, thanks Andy.

-Ken


-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Sharp
Sent: Wed 6/13/2007 10:33 AM
To: Ken Renshaw
Cc: Maxim Kozlovsky; Larry Scheer
Subject: Re: Perforce back online - Was: RE: something wrong with p4
=20
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:54:09 -0700 "Ken Renshaw"
<ken.renshaw@onstor.com> wrote:


> -I logged into the server, saw a p4 child process taking up 100's of
> megabytes ( unusual ), and restarted p4d which should have cleaned it
> up w/o client hiccups

Always nuke the client process, not the server.  No matter what, that
client process/operation is toast anyway, but no reason to hose other
client processes and their ops as well.

Cheers,

a



------_=_NextPart_001_01C7ADE1.C3F8CE85
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>RE: Perforce back online - Was: RE: something wrong with =
p4</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Sure, if he wants the blame too ;)<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Maxim Kozlovsky<BR>
Sent: Wed 6/13/2007 10:37 AM<BR>
To: Ken Renshaw; Andy Sharp<BR>
Cc: Larry Scheer<BR>
Subject: RE: Perforce back online - Was: RE: something wrong with p4<BR>
<BR>
I think Andy is trying to volunteer for the job of p4 administrator. =
Should we let him do it from now on?<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Ken Renshaw<BR>
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2007 10:35 AM<BR>
To: Andy Sharp<BR>
Cc: Maxim Kozlovsky; Larry Scheer<BR>
Subject: RE: Perforce back online - Was: RE: something wrong with p4<BR>
<BR>
Lesson learned the hard way, thanks Andy.<BR>
<BR>
-Ken<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Andy Sharp<BR>
Sent: Wed 6/13/2007 10:33 AM<BR>
To: Ken Renshaw<BR>
Cc: Maxim Kozlovsky; Larry Scheer<BR>
Subject: Re: Perforce back online - Was: RE: something wrong with p4<BR>
<BR>
On Tue, 12 Jun 2007 19:54:09 -0700 &quot;Ken Renshaw&quot;<BR>
&lt;ken.renshaw@onstor.com&gt; wrote:<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
&gt; -I logged into the server, saw a p4 child process taking up 100's =
of<BR>
&gt; megabytes ( unusual ), and restarted p4d which should have cleaned =
it<BR>
&gt; up w/o client hiccups<BR>
<BR>
Always nuke the client process, not the server.&nbsp; No matter what, =
that<BR>
client process/operation is toast anyway, but no reason to hose =
other<BR>
client processes and their ops as well.<BR>
<BR>
Cheers,<BR>
<BR>
a<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C7ADE1.C3F8CE85--
