X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C8324A.B02F806E@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:42:54 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: intel takes a beating
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 21:42:51 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E06C963CD@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20071127161403.07bc5fcb@ripper.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: intel takes a beating
Thread-Index: AcgxU5VkDtafv1LvQ/ucFt81J3qFCAA9HznQ
References: <20071127161403.07bc5fcb@ripper.onstor.net>
From: "Brian Stark" <brian.stark@onstor.com>
To: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>

I'm not surprised that AMD is taking it to Intel.  AMD has some distinct
advantages over Intel, particularly because accesses to memory are much
faster since Opteron has its own memory controllers...
=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp=20
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 4:14 PM
> To: Brian Stark
> Subject: intel takes a beating
>=20
> Check this out.  Even though these guys are obviously taking=20
> money from Intel, they couldn't help but report that AMD is=20
> whomping the Intel quad cores.  And interestingly enough,=20
> someone just came to me today and asked if we could have java=20
> on the SSC.
>=20
> http://anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.aspx?i=3D3162&p=3D9
>=20
