X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C80C1E.53AC10B1@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:49:37 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Case 6127 Duplicate MAC addresses
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:49:37 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0346AADA@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E045EBD39@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Case 6127 Duplicate MAC addresses
Thread-Index: AcgMDZ5pkc0MTnOhSE+WDvjDJvQFWAABIZpKAAK8ZUAAADqWRgAABTRQ
From: "John Rogers" <john.rogers@onstor.com>
To: "Huy Duong" <huy.duong@onstor.com>,
	"Carlos Mora" <carlos.mora@onstor.com>,
	"Paul Onofrietti (Glasshouse)" <paulo@css.glasshouse.com>,
	"dl-cstech" <dl-cstech@onstor.com>

I wonder what kind of network switch we are connected to and what its
configuration is.

If there's no lport config the mac's shouldn't be doing that. They
shouldn't be doing the bit rot thing Andy pointed out either.=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Huy Duong=20
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 8:47 AM
To: John Rogers; Carlos Mora; Paul Onofrietti (Glasshouse); dl-cstech
Subject: Re: Case 6127 Duplicate MAC addresses

No, I looked through the lport config.
-----------------------------------------
Huy Duong
ONStor Strategic Support Account Manager=20
Phone 408.963.2478=20
Cell    408.431.6803=20
http://support.onstor.com/
Sent From My Blackberry


-----Original Message-----
From: John Rogers
To: Carlos Mora; Paul Onofrietti (Glasshouse); dl-cstech
Sent: Thu Oct 11 08:41:07 2007
Subject: RE: Case 6127 Duplicate MAC addresses

Is there an lport aggregation setup on this system?

-----Original Message-----
From: Carlos Mora=20
Sent: Thursday, October 11, 2007 7:22 AM
To: Paul Onofrietti (Glasshouse); dl-cstech
Subject: RE: Case 6127 Duplicate MAC addresses

Paul,

From what I have seen, when the ports are up, they have the same mac:

cslab1 diag> port show all
Port Show All
          Link      Link      Interface   Frame
Port      State     Speed       Type      Size           WWN
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
sp2.0     UP        2 Gbit     F_PORT     2048      500073400001ef20
sp2.1     UP        2 Gbit     F_PORT     2048      500073400001ef21
fp1.0     UP        1 Gbit     GE_ETH     1500      00:07:34:01:ef:11
fp1.1     UP        1 Gbit     GE_ETH     1500      00:07:34:01:ef:11
fp1.2     DOWN      1 Gbit     GE_ETH     1500      00:07:34:01:ef:12
fp1.3     DOWN      1 Gbit     GE_ETH     1500      00:07:34:01:ef:13
cslab1 diag>

--
Carlos Mora
carlos.mora@onstor.com
ONStor, Inc.
Sr. Technical Support Engineer
(408)802-5602



-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Onofrietti (Glasshouse)
Sent: Thu 10/11/2007 9:51 AM
To: dl-cstech
Subject: Case 6127 Duplicate MAC addresses
=20
Customer is seeing the same MAC address on all fp interfaces.

Rebooting the system clears the issue.

=20

fp1.0 UP 1 Gbit GE_ETH 1500 e1:08:e1:08:e1:08=20
fp1.1 UP 1 Gbit GE_ETH 1500 e1:08:e1:08:e1:08=20
fp1.2 UP 1 Gbit GE_ETH 1500 e1:08:e1:08:e1:08=20
fp1.3 UP 1 Gbit GE_ETH 1500 e1:08:e1:08:e1:08

=20

Anyone have Ideas?

=20

Thanks,

PAUL


