X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C7FF86.279DF5E2@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Tue, 25 Sep 2007 07:10:05 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7FF86.279DF5E2"
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Removal and replacement of compact flash cards in live systems ... case 5903
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 07:08:48 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02176252@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Removal and replacement of compact flash cards in live systems ... case 5903
Thread-Index: Acf/aUufgbbAdlAmTICdgN/MoiLnAQAHK3IU
References: <200709251142.l8PBgal11393@mailhost-rtp.css.glasshouse.com>
From: "Sandrine Boulanger" <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
To: "Alan Cooke (Glasshouse)" <acooke@css.glasshouse.com>,
	"dl-cstech" <dl-cstech@onstor.com>
Cc: "Frontline Support" <support@cc.onstor.com>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C7FF86.279DF5E2
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

risk is low. long time ago this used to sometimes trigger a bsd crash on =
the primary but I haven't seen that for a long time.


-----Original Message-----
From: Alan Cooke (Glasshouse)
Sent: Tue 9/25/2007 4:43 AM
To: dl-cstech
Cc: Frontline Support
Subject: Removal and replacement of compact flash cards in live systems =
... case 5903
=20
Hi All,

I have a customer with 2 broken flash cards in one system. Case 5903.

We want to do a system copy all -i on the good system and use that card =
to fix the bad box.

The customer does not want to take the good working system down though.

What are the dangers of removing the backup flash card and putting in =
another whilst the system is live?

Should we just say no?

At their own risk?

=20

=20

Thanks . Alan.



------_=_NextPart_001_01C7FF86.279DF5E2
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>RE: Removal and replacement of compact flash cards in live =
systems ... case 5903</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>risk is low. long time ago this used to sometimes =
trigger a bsd crash on the primary but I haven't seen that for a long =
time.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Alan Cooke (Glasshouse)<BR>
Sent: Tue 9/25/2007 4:43 AM<BR>
To: dl-cstech<BR>
Cc: Frontline Support<BR>
Subject: Removal and replacement of compact flash cards in live systems =
... case 5903<BR>
<BR>
Hi All,<BR>
<BR>
I have a customer with 2 broken flash cards in one system. Case =
5903.<BR>
<BR>
We want to do a system copy all -i on the good system and use that card =
to fix the bad box.<BR>
<BR>
The customer does not want to take the good working system down =
though.<BR>
<BR>
What are the dangers of removing the backup flash card and putting in =
another whilst the system is live?<BR>
<BR>
Should we just say no?<BR>
<BR>
At their own risk?<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
Thanks . Alan.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C7FF86.279DF5E2--
