X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C7F919.F34319F7@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Mon, 17 Sep 2007 03:00:25 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: question regarding TED 19560
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 03:00:24 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0587B7AD@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20070914235908.7c54a678@ripper.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: question regarding TED 19560
Thread-Index: Acf3Zeq4kLTqri+uTK+UVzW9dm4E/ABstKyA
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0587B675@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <20070914235908.7c54a678@ripper.onstor.net>
From: "Ed Kwan" <ed.kwan@onstor.com>
To: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>

It could be the choice of words in the current error messages.  "failed
-ignoring" could mean I don't know what to do, so I'm ignoring the
failure. =20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp
> Sent: Friday, September 14, 2007 11:59 PM
> To: Ed Kwan
> Subject: Re: question regarding TED 19560
>=20
> Hey Ed,
>=20
> You know me.  It's hard for me to elevate my feelings about this to
> a level above minor disgust when it says right in the message that it
> should be ignored.  I guess some people just can't ignore things even
> when they're told.
>=20
> Go ahead and knock yourself out.  If it's changed in version 3.x+ and
> you can never have those partitions in that release or later, then it
> seems to be no problem.
>=20
> Thanks for the well wishes.  I sure miss things like a little cart
> racing and being able to go to work and such.
>=20
> Cheers,
>=20
> a
>=20
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 19:49:40 -0700 "Ed Kwan" <ed.kwan@onstor.com>
wrote:
>=20
> > Hi Andy,
> >
> > Hope you're feeling better.  I thought you were just out on
vacation.
> >
> > Regarding TED 19560, looks like you intentionally newfs partitions
"g"
> > and "h", and ignore the errors.
> > Apparently, this has generated some support calls.  I'm tempted to
> > skip "g" and "h", like:
> >
> > =3D=3D=3D=3D =
//depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash-openbsd.c#4 -
> > /homes/edk/p4/dev/nfx-tree/code/ssc-nfxsh/cmd_flash-openbsd.c =
=3D=3D=3D=3D
> > ***************
> > *** 818,824 ****
> >   make_filesystems(void)
> >   {
> >         int error =3D 0;
> > !       char disk_parts[] =3D "adefgh"; /* 'c' is entire disk, 'b' =
is
> > swap */
> >         char *p;
> >
> >         become_root();
> > --- 818,825 ----
> >   make_filesystems(void)
> >   {
> >         int error =3D 0;
> > !     char disk_parts[] =3D "adef"; /* 'c' is entire disk, 'b' is =
swap
> > */ !                                 /* 'g' and 'h' are not used in
> > 3.x */ char *p;
> >
> >         become_root();
> >
> > Let me know what you think.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ed
> >
