X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C8B4A5.F5262F48@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Mon, 12 May 2008 20:03:45 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: /etc/hosts
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 20:03:45 -0700
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E03E9A856@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080512195759.1d4b4841@ripper.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: /etc/hosts
Thread-Index: Aci0pSi+xe22tZPBRWKA6RNCNPDD8gAACSrQ
From: "Chris Vandever" <chris.vandever@onstor.com>
To: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
Cc: "Manohar Divate" <manohar.divate@onstor.com>,
	"dl-Cougar" <dl-Cougar@onstor.com>

In that case wouldn't g10r204 be correct?  That makes mores sense since
it has neither those pesky ipv6 entries, nor the .sc1 oddity.

ChrisV

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Sharp=20
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:58 PM
To: Chris Vandever
Cc: Manohar Divate; dl-Cougar
Subject: Re: /etc/hosts

OK, here's my reply, so only 10 more to go! ~:^) But you've probably
been looking at this file a lot lately, so I won't dare correct.

sc1 only is not technically incorrect, but probably is in this case.

I thought we axed the ipv6 entries?



On Mon, 12 May 2008 19:35:36 -0700 "Chris Vandever"
<chris.vandever@onstor.com> wrote:

> I'm sure a dozen people will correct me, but my understanding is that
> the first one (on g9r204) is the correct format.  I believe the one on
> g10r204 is an older variant that should have been overwritten on the
> last system upgrade.
>=20
> I'm not sure about having only a .sc1 address, however.  I thought it
> would be a .sc0 address for cougar.
>=20
> [Ducking behind my shield now...]
>=20
> ChrisV
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manohar Divate=20
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:26 PM
> To: dl-Cougar
> Subject: /etc/hosts
>=20
> I see two different kind   of /etc/hosts entries  in a cluster
>=20
> Is it oK or a concern :-)
>=20
>=20
> g9r204:~# cat /etc/hosts
> 127.0.0.1               localhost
>=20
> # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
> # (added automatically by netbase upgrade)
>=20
> ::1     ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
> fe00::0 ip6-localnet
> ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
> ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
> ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
> ff02::3 ip6-allhosts
> 10.2.204.9              g9r204  g9r204.sc1
> g9r204:~# nfxsh
>=20
> Welcome to the ONStor NAS Gateway.
>=20
> g9r204 diag> int show int
> Interface  Table
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Interface     Admin.     Operation  Mac Address         LPORT
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> sc0           UP         UP         0:7:34:7:52:0       sc0
> sc1           DOWN       DOWN       0:7:34:7:52:1       sc1
>=20
> g10r204:~# cat /etc/hosts
> 127.0.0.1               localhost
> 10.2.204.10 g10r204.sc0 g10r204
> 10.2.204.20 g10r204.sc1 g10r204
> g10r204:~# nfxsh -t
>=20
>=20
>=20
