X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C8AC9A.D937C210@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Fri, 2 May 2008 14:24:04 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C8AC9A.D937C210"
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: CQ Cleanup
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 14:24:04 -0700
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E09CA562F@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E09B2BB67@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: CQ Cleanup
Thread-Index: Acir6vlgO4z9CjzFRy6VLOxFHx8nmQAoNZbg
From: "Paul Hammer" <paul.hammer@onstor.com>
To: "Sandrine Boulanger" <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>,
	"Vikas Saini" <vikas.saini@onstor.com>,
	"Raj Kumar" <raj.kumar@onstor.com>,
	"Jonathan Goldick" <jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>,
	"Tim Gardner" <tim.gardner@onstor.com>,
	"Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C8AC9A.D937C210
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

We should exclude ECR's and partner owned defects since neither of these
has a direct engineering impact. Leave those defects alone.

I am okay with the cutoff being release 2.2 and greater and defects
submitted after 12/31/2006 (being the ones left open).=20

Like the blocker field, could just be yes or no toggle. I would keep MF
for Beta and GA a separate field.

Think that all defects that are in QA (only 14) we should retest.

How do you suggest we tag all of the defects that were closed as part of
this effort? Move them all to Limbo, create a new state, put a tag in
the notes field?

_____________________________________________
From: Sandrine Boulanger=20
Sent: 2008-05-01 17:25
To: Paul Hammer; Vikas Saini; Raj Kumar; Jonathan Goldick; Tim Gardner;
Andy Sharp
Subject: CQ Cleanup

I ran a few queries to find out the scale of the cleanup. Please give
your feedback on how to proceed. For the first 2 categories, do you
agree with the query and the state?


Priority cleanup
453 defects (I removed ECR) that are in states Opened, Reviewed,
Re-opened, Failed, More-Info, Assigned or WIP do not have a priority.
Number reduces to 168 if I pick only defects filed after 1/1/2007

Problem area cleanup
Same query as above for states, non ECR, filed after 1/1/2007 gives
178 for Problem area=3DSW-System
40 for Problem area=3DOther

Close defects where project < 2.2 and submittal date < 1/1/2007:
685 defects in DEV and TRIAGE (out of which 117 are ECR, and another 114
are reported by Customers)
44 defects in Support
14 in QA (NR, DUP, Fixed)
49 are PARTNERS issues

Don't know if we can blindly close them, here are a few examples:
autogrow is not triggered when restoring a big file
Vscan breaks if NFS is disabled for a given virtual server
Vscan sever did not scan the files while under stress
Can't access widelink pointing to autocreated share from another
autocreated share
Execution Priv/deny from CIFS domain and allow from NIS domain is not
properly  enforced
Vscan is not working if interface is created with nfs=3Ddisable
Large cluster DB size (27MB) breaks cluster communication
Quota rebuild performance is terrible
Can't delete a duplicate interface IP on the SSC

Way to prioritize defects instead of adding strings in Notes that cannot
be removed:
=3D> add a new field with editable list where we can add "Blocker for
Beta, MF for Beta, Blocker for GA" etc...

------_=_NextPart_001_01C8AC9A.D937C210
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Dus-ascii">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7653.38">
<TITLE>RE: CQ Cleanup</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/rtf format -->

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT =
COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">We should exclude =
ECR</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT =
COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">&#8217;</FONT></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">s and partner owned defects since neither of =
these has a direct engineering impact. Leave those defects =
alone.</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">I am okay with the cutoff being</FONT></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"> <FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">release</FONT></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"> <FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">2.2 and greater and defec</FONT></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">t</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">s</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"> <FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">submitted</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial"> after =
12/31/2006 (</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">being the =
ones left open). </FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">Like the blocker</FONT></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"> <FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">field</FONT></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">, could just be yes or no toggle. I would keep =
MF for Beta and</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"> <FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">GA</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"> <FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">a</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"> <FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">separate</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial"></FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"> <FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">field</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">.</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">Think that all defects that are in QA (only 14) we should =
retest.</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">How do you suggest we tag all of the defects that were =
closed as part of this effort? Move them all to Limbo, create a new =
state, put a tag in the notes</FONT></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"> <FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">field</FONT></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT COLOR=3D"#000080" =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">?</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT =
SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Tahoma">_____________________________________________<BR>
</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><B></B></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Tahoma">From:</FONT></B></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma"> Sandrine Boulanger<BR>
</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><B></B></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Tahoma">Sent:</FONT></B></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma"> 2008-05-01 17:25<BR>
</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><B></B></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Tahoma">To:</FONT></B></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Tahoma"> Paul Hammer; Vikas Saini; =
Raj Kumar; Jonathan Goldick; Tim Gardner; Andy Sharp<BR>
</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><B></B></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Tahoma">Subject:</FONT></B></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Tahoma"> CQ Cleanup</FONT></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">I ran a few queries to find out the scale of the =
cleanup. Please give your feedback on how to proceed. For the first 2 =
categories, do you agree with the query and the state?</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><B></B></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><B></B></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">Priority cleanup</FONT></B></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">453 defects (I removed ECR) that are in states =
Opened, Reviewed, Re-opened, Failed, More-Info, Assigned or WIP do not =
have a priority.</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Number =
reduces to 168 if I pick only defects filed after =
1/1/2007</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><B></B></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Problem area =
cleanup</FONT></B></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Same query as above for states, non ECR, filed =
after 1/1/2007 gives</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">178 for =
Problem area=3DSW-System</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">40 for =
Problem area=3DOther</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><B></B></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><B></B></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Close =
defects where project &lt; 2.2 and submittal date &lt; =
1/1/2007:</FONT></B></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">685 defects in DEV and TRIAGE (out of which 117 =
are ECR, and another 114 are reported by Customers)</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">44 =
defects in Support</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">14 in QA =
(NR, DUP, Fixed)</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">49 are =
PARTNERS issues</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 =
FACE=3D"Arial">Don&#8217;t know if we can blindly close them, here are a =
few examples:</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"MS Shell Dlg">autogrow is not triggered when restoring =
a big file</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"MS Shell =
Dlg">Vscan breaks if NFS is disabled for a given virtual =
server</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"MS Shell =
Dlg">Vscan sever did not scan the files while under =
stress</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"MS Shell =
Dlg">Can't access widelink pointing to autocreated share from another =
autocreated share</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"MS Shell =
Dlg">Execution Priv/deny from CIFS domain and allow from NIS domain is =
not&nbsp; properly&nbsp; enforced</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"MS Shell =
Dlg">Vscan is not working if interface is created with =
nfs=3Ddisable</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"MS Shell =
Dlg">Large cluster DB size (27MB) breaks cluster =
communication</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"MS Shell =
Dlg">Quota rebuild performance is terrible</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"MS Shell =
Dlg">Can't delete a duplicate interface IP on the SSC</FONT></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><B></B></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"><B><FONT SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">Way to prioritize =
defects instead of adding strings in Notes that cannot be =
removed:</FONT></B></SPAN></P>

<P DIR=3DLTR><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"><FONT =
SIZE=3D2 FACE=3D"Arial">=3D&gt; add a new field with editable list where =
we can add &#8220;Blocker for Beta, MF for Beta, Blocker for GA&#8221; =
etc&#8230;</FONT></SPAN><SPAN LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN><SPAN =
LANG=3D"en-us"></SPAN></P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C8AC9A.D937C210--
