X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C884A8.95023792@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:21:36 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Initial Configuration for review
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 18:21:36 -0700
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0346B0BE@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E08D2A227@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Initial Configuration for review
Thread-Index: AciDxVqoF1bddafsQfq00EBQ01t+rwAJsNDAAC79TxA=
From: "John Rogers" <john.rogers@onstor.com>
To: "Tim Gardner" <tim.gardner@onstor.com>,
	"Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>,
	"Sudharsan Srinivasan" <sudharsan@onstor.com>
Cc: "Paul Hammer" <paul.hammer@onstor.com>,
	"Narain Ramadass" <narain.ramadass@onstor.com>,
	"Sripal Surendiran (HCL)" <sripal.surendiran@onstor.com>,
	"Sudharsan Srinivasan" <sudharsan@onstor.com>

Zoning and lun masking was completed for these two systems to see the
same luns. I could not verify the configuration, however due to the
instability of both systems.

From what I can see on the switch and the storage you should be able to
see the same set of luns from 500073400001a221 and 500073400100020.

Let me know if you have some difficulty with it once the systems are
stable.

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Gardner=20
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 7:53 PM
To: Andy Sharp; Sudharsan Srinivasan
Cc: Paul Hammer; Narain Ramadass; Sripal Surendiran (HCL); Sudharsan
Srinivasan; John Rogers
Subject: RE: Initial Configuration for review

I filed an elab request last week regarding eng54.=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp=20
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2008 2:15 PM
> To: Sudharsan Srinivasan
> Cc: Tim Gardner; Paul Hammer; Narain Ramadass; Sripal=20
> Surendiran (HCL); Sudharsan Srinivasan; John Rogers
> Subject: Re: Initial Configuration for review
>=20
> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 05:04:13 -0700 "Sudharsan Srinivasan"
> <sudharsan@onstor.com> wrote:
>=20
> > Tim,
> > Here is the update for today. Testing migration of Cougar=20
> with Bobcat
> > flash having R98 version in it is also completed.=20
> >=20
> > Andy,
> > We are waiting for your review comments, in order to check in the
> > changes.
>=20
> Oops, I forgot.  A couple more comments below.
>=20
> > Regards,
> > Sudharsan
> >=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sudharsan Srinivasan=20
> > Sent: Monday, March 10, 2008 5:48 PM
> > To: Tim Gardner
> > Cc: Paul Hammer; Narain Ramadass; Sripal Surendiran (HCL);=20
> Andy Sharp
> > Subject: RE: Initial Configuration for review
> >=20
> > Hi Tim,
> > Please find attached the updated schedule with actual
> > duration/completion date.
> >=20
> > Here is the summary
> > 1. We are waiting for review comments, in order to check in the
> > changes. 2. Changes needed in NCM are also completed and currently
> > unit testing is in progress. It can be checked in along with changes
> > made for FTI. 3. We are able to build tar ball for cougar. We tested
> > FTI using this and it works fine.
> > 4. We are yet to test migration of Cougar with Bobcat flash=20
> having R98
> > version in it.
> >=20
> > Following defects / issues need to be handled
> > 5. Load from secondary flash is not working (There is already bug
> > filed on the CQ TED00022323).
>=20
> The fix for this is in the dev branch, and you should be able to
> integrate it to your branch to do your testing.
>=20
> > 6. TED00022468 system reboot -s didn't reboot from secondary flash.
> > Therefore we could not test after performing clean flash
> > initialization.
>=20
> You can work around this problem with the PROM by starting with the
> primary flash as /dev/sdb1, and the secondary as /dev/sda1.  From that
> starting point, a "system reboot -s" should work as advertised.
>=20
> > 7. TED00022644 /etc/ntp.conf file in cougar seems to
> > be inconsistent.
>=20
> This can also be worked around but it's pretty minor.
>=20
> > 8. Zoning is not done for g7r10 and eng54. If this
> > is taken care we could test FTI with migration integrated.
>=20
> Does John Rodgers know about this?  CC'ing him on this, but filing an
> Elab request usually makes things go faster unless he already=20
> knows and
> is working on it.
>=20
> > Regards
> > Sudharsan
> >=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Sripal Surendiran (HCL)=20
> > Sent: Saturday, March 08, 2008 4:46 PM
> > To: Andy Sharp
> > Cc: Tim Gardner; Paul Hammer; Narain Ramadass; Sudharsan Srinivasan
> > Subject: Re: Initial Configuration for review
> >=20
> > Andy,
> >=20
> > Here you go:
> >=20
> > Change id 28254
> >=20
> > Thanks,
> > Sripal.
> >=20
> > Andrew Sharp wrote:
> > > Hi Sripal,
> > >
> > > Yes, I can review this.  Please do me a favor and gather all the
> > > changed files into a single changelist number for me?  You can use
> > > the perforce command "p4 change" (or use the GUI) to do so if you
> > > haven't already.  Then send me the cl#
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > a
> > >
>=20
