X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C7125D.F3D02509@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:55:13 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7125D.F3D02509"
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Cutoff for 2.1
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:55:08 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E013D2573@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Cutoff for 2.1
thread-index: AccSXYSbHS0eGZzcTjq56u59OG4iogAAA1uwAAAXuHQ=
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E013D2571@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E01335F80@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
From: "Paul Hammer" <paul.hammer@onstor.com>
To: "Ken Renshaw" <ken.renshaw@onstor.com>,
	"Ed Kwan" <ed.kwan@onstor.com>
Cc: "dl-Clio" <dl-Clio@onstor.com>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C7125D.F3D02509
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Cool. Thanks.

________________________________

From: Ken Renshaw
Sent: Mon 11/27/2006 11:52 AM
To: Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
Cc: dl-Clio
Subject: RE: Cutoff for 2.1



Neither 1333, nor 1334 if we do one, are in 2.1 yet but will be after =
they are built and tested.

2004 was just a port of FS fixes and according to Jobi 2.1 is a =
superset, so we're fine there.

So just 1333/4 would be on that list.

Thanks,

-Ken


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Hammer
Sent: Mon 11/27/2006 11:52 AM
To: Ed Kwan; Ken Renshaw
Cc: dl-Clio
Subject: Cutoff for 2.1

Hi Ed,

All patches need to be rolled into 2.1 by this Friday.

Assume that all the fixes in 1331, 1332, 1333, 1334 and 2004 will be in =
2.1 Do you agree?

Which ones have not yet been merged into 2.1 (if any)?

Thanks,

-Paul




------_=_NextPart_001_01C7125D.F3D02509
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML dir=3Dltr><HEAD><TITLE>RE: Cutoff for 2.1</TITLE>=0A=
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Dunicode">=0A=
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2995" name=3DGENERATOR></HEAD>=0A=
<BODY>=0A=
<DIV id=3DidOWAReplyText52252 dir=3Dltr>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><FONT face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size=3D2>Cool. =
Thanks.</FONT></DIV></DIV>=0A=
<DIV dir=3Dltr><BR>=0A=
<HR tabIndex=3D-1>=0A=
<FONT face=3DTahoma size=3D2><B>From:</B> Ken Renshaw<BR><B>Sent:</B> =
Mon 11/27/2006 11:52 AM<BR><B>To:</B> Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan<BR><B>Cc:</B> =
dl-Clio<BR><B>Subject:</B> RE: Cutoff for 2.1<BR></FONT><BR></DIV>=0A=
<DIV>=0A=
<P><FONT size=3D2>Neither 1333, nor 1334 if we do one, are in 2.1 yet =
but will be after they are built and tested.<BR><BR>2004 was just a port =
of FS fixes and according to Jobi 2.1 is a superset, so we're fine =
there.<BR><BR>So just 1333/4 would be on that =
list.<BR><BR>Thanks,<BR><BR>-Ken<BR><BR><BR>-----Original =
Message-----<BR>From: Paul Hammer<BR>Sent: Mon 11/27/2006 11:52 =
AM<BR>To: Ed Kwan; Ken Renshaw<BR>Cc: dl-Clio<BR>Subject: Cutoff for =
2.1<BR><BR>Hi Ed,<BR><BR>All patches need to be rolled into 2.1 by this =
Friday.<BR><BR>Assume that all the fixes in 1331, 1332, 1333, 1334 and =
2004 will be in 2.1 Do you agree?<BR><BR>Which ones have not yet been =
merged into 2.1 (if =
any)?<BR><BR>Thanks,<BR><BR>-Paul<BR><BR></FONT></P></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C7125D.F3D02509--
