X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C7125D.C7B9A037@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:53:59 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C7125D.C7B9A037"
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Cutoff for 2.1
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:52:29 -0800
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E01335F80@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Cutoff for 2.1
thread-index: AccSXYSbHS0eGZzcTjq56u59OG4iogAAA1uw
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E013D2571@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
From: "Ken Renshaw" <ken.renshaw@onstor.com>
To: "Paul Hammer" <paul.hammer@onstor.com>,
	"Ed Kwan" <ed.kwan@onstor.com>
Cc: "dl-Clio" <dl-Clio@onstor.com>

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------_=_NextPart_001_01C7125D.C7B9A037
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Neither 1333, nor 1334 if we do one, are in 2.1 yet but will be after =
they are built and tested.

2004 was just a port of FS fixes and according to Jobi 2.1 is a =
superset, so we're fine there.

So just 1333/4 would be on that list.

Thanks,

-Ken


-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Hammer
Sent: Mon 11/27/2006 11:52 AM
To: Ed Kwan; Ken Renshaw
Cc: dl-Clio
Subject: Cutoff for 2.1
=20
Hi Ed,
=20
All patches need to be rolled into 2.1 by this Friday.=20
=20
Assume that all the fixes in 1331, 1332, 1333, 1334 and 2004 will be in =
2.1 Do you agree?=20
=20
Which ones have not yet been merged into 2.1 (if any)?
=20
Thanks,
=20
-Paul


------_=_NextPart_001_01C7125D.C7B9A037
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7650.28">
<TITLE>RE: Cutoff for 2.1</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->

<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Neither 1333, nor 1334 if we do one, are in 2.1 yet =
but will be after they are built and tested.<BR>
<BR>
2004 was just a port of FS fixes and according to Jobi 2.1 is a =
superset, so we're fine there.<BR>
<BR>
So just 1333/4 would be on that list.<BR>
<BR>
Thanks,<BR>
<BR>
-Ken<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: Paul Hammer<BR>
Sent: Mon 11/27/2006 11:52 AM<BR>
To: Ed Kwan; Ken Renshaw<BR>
Cc: dl-Clio<BR>
Subject: Cutoff for 2.1<BR>
<BR>
Hi Ed,<BR>
<BR>
All patches need to be rolled into 2.1 by this Friday.<BR>
<BR>
Assume that all the fixes in 1331, 1332, 1333, 1334 and 2004 will be in =
2.1 Do you agree?<BR>
<BR>
Which ones have not yet been merged into 2.1 (if any)?<BR>
<BR>
Thanks,<BR>
<BR>
-Paul<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>

</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C7125D.C7B9A037--
