X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C87410.89FD6582@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:32:56 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: please review 27937
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 15:32:56 -0700
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0875E2DF@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080220143110.74b08a16@ripper.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: please review 27937
Thread-Index: Ach0EEvca5Eguf3TQx+qCZzT21ucRAAABUrw
References: <20080220141254.2692db28@ripper.onstor.net><BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0875E2B4@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <20080220143110.74b08a16@ripper.onstor.net>
From: "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
To: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
Cc: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>

I don't see what the alleged bug is. Could you please let me know the
defect number?

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andy Sharp
>Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:31 PM
>To: Maxim Kozlovsky
>Cc: Larry Scheer
>Subject: Re: please review 27937
>
>On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:18:14 -0800 "Maxim Kozlovsky"
><maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com> wrote:
>
>> What does "It" in "it builds" mean? Did you do a clean build? I am
>> sure I did this for the reason and I don't appreciate your calling
>> this "abuse". The world of Oss is not limited to linux and openbsd,
>> you know. EEE is also an OS in some sense.
>
>Abuse of a variable is abuse whether you like it or not; don't blame
the
>messenger.  And this has nothing to do with "the world".  It's only
>about SSC OS.  Perhaps you should learn not to take every bug you
>create so heavily -- it will lead you to an early grave.
>Especially small stuff like this.  Besides, it might have been an
>existing variable that was unclearly defined, so it might not even be
>your bug. That's what I meant about the variable should probably have
>been called SSC_OS.
>
>And yes, a [mostly] clean build.  What other kind is there?
>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Andy Sharp
>> >Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2008 2:13 PM
>> >To: Larry Scheer; Maxim Kozlovsky
>> >Subject: please review 27937
>> >
>> >I'm sending this to both of you because it involves makefiles and/or
>> >code you may have written or know about.  Yes, I am a bit nervous
>> >about it.  It builds on both cougar and bobcat/openbsd, but...
>> >
>> >Change 27937 by andys@ripper on 2008/02/19 14:20:57 *pending*
>> >
>> >        Ai-eee.
>> >        Fix abuse of OS make variable.  This variable is limited
>> >        to the two SSC operating systems, either openbsd or linux.
>> >        eee is not one of those.  Really this variable should have
>> >        been called SSC_OS or something, but that's probably
>> >        already used for something completely different.
>> >
>> >        reviewed by
>> >
>> >Affected files ...
>> >
>> >... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/Includes/eee/ipm-if.h#1 delete
>> >... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/Tools/defs.mk#11 edit
>> >... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-elog/eee.h#1 delete
>> >... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-ipmd-lib/eee.h#1 delete
