X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C86F5E.495EBD5A@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:06:52 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 16:06:52 -0700
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0856E6BC@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080214145022.4c95aa7e@ripper.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Status of today's build.
Thread-Index: AchvW/w/DoOAS661TTmeYZI7pMoXigAAC4OQ
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0856E52F@onstor-exch02.onstor.net><BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E05C7424C@onstor-exch02.onstor.net><BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0856E634@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <20080214145022.4c95aa7e@ripper.onstor.net>
From: "Brian Stark" <brian.stark@onstor.com>
To: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>,
	"Warren Gale" <warren.gale@onstor.com>
Cc: "Sandrine Boulanger" <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>,
	"Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>,
	"Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>,
	"dl-Cougar" <dl-Cougar@onstor.com>,
	"Jobi Ariyamannil" <jobi.ariyamannil@onstor.com>,
	"Vikas Saini" <vikas.saini@onstor.com>,
	"Ken Renshaw" <ken.renshaw@onstor.com>,
	"Paul Hammer" <paul.hammer@onstor.com>,
	"Ed Kwan" <ed.kwan@onstor.com>

This is exactly why I've said that PROMs should only come from PROM
developers, and once an official release is made, it's attached into
Agile Software, which is the database used by Hardware and Ops. =20
=20

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp=20
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 2:50 PM
> To: Warren Gale
> Cc: Sandrine Boulanger; Larry Scheer; Maxim Kozlovsky;=20
> dl-Cougar; Jobi Ariyamannil; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw; Paul=20
> Hammer; Ed Kwan
> Subject: Re: Status of today's build.
>=20
> I'm sorry, but Sandrine is completely correct, there never=20
> should have been two different 1.0.3 proms.  That was a no-no.
>=20
> On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:10:36 -0800 "Warren Gale"
> <warren.gale@onstor.com> wrote:
>=20
> > Since the PROMs have moved under the dev tree, any developer could=20
> > make their own proms which would have the current=20
> "tree-name" inserted=20
> > in the version string. With Wiki page build and upgrade=20
> instructions,=20
> > anyone could have done an update with a non-released version.
> > Notes were kept by Rick based on Change List numbers, which I am=20
> > looking for at this point.
> > As far as I know there was pro-active work done to update=20
> all QA and=20
> > dev systems.
> >=20
> > _____________________________________________
> > From: Sandrine Boulanger
> > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 1:43 PM
> > To: Warren Gale; Larry Scheer; Maxim Kozlovsky; dl-Cougar
> > Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw; Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> > Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> >=20
> > Also, how come there would be multiple versions of 1.0.3 proms, and=20
> > why there is no pro-active update when new proms are=20
> available, along=20
> > with some notes that explain what has changed?
> >=20
> > _____________________________________________
> > From: Warren Gale
> > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:58 AM
> > To: Larry Scheer; Maxim Kozlovsky; dl-Cougar
> > Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;=20
> > Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> > Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> >=20
> > Ok, at this point we need to have physical consoles=20
> attached to TXRX ,=20
> > FP, and SSC, to be able to do the upgrade.
> >=20
> > _____________________________________________
> > From: Larry Scheer
> > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:44 AM
> > To: Maxim Kozlovsky; dl-Cougar
> > Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;=20
> > Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> > Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> >=20
> > Yes indeed! My answer was right there in my email. Notice=20
> the the TXRX=20
> > prompt : "DEBUG-TXRX0:0 >" The TXRX is crashed!
> >=20
> > To be redundant... I need new PROM images!
> >=20
> > _____________________________________________
> > From: Maxim Kozlovsky
> > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:40 AM
> > To: Larry Scheer; dl-Cougar
> > Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;=20
> > Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> > Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> >=20
> > Actually that problem with the optimized build was not fixed until=20
> > January 17, so your prom can not be right.
> >=20
> > _____________________________________________
> > From: Larry Scheer
> > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:30 AM
> > To: Larry Scheer; Maxim Kozlovsky; dl-Cougar
> > Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;=20
> > Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> > Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> >=20
> > I'm talking to Warren. He pointed out that I need to look=20
> at the TXRX=20
> > and FP PROM. Here is the versions from the other processors:
> >=20
> > FP0:1 > ver
> > ver
> >=20
> > NFP_FP : R4.0.0.DEV-CG-021308 : Wed Feb 13 23:47:44 2008=20
> > PROM_SIBYTE_CG : Cougar-prom-1.0.3 : Thu Dec 20 11:25:51 2007
> >=20
> > DEBUG-TXRX0:0 > ver
> > ver
> >=20
> > NFP_TXRX : R4.0.0.DEV-CG-021308 : Wed Feb 13 23:51:17 2008=20
> > PROM_SIBYTE_CG : Cougar-prom-1.0.3 : Thu Dec 20 11:25:51 2007
> >=20
> > Warren says he thinks I am ok, even though it is not the=20
> latest 1.0.3.
> >=20
> > _____________________________________________
> > From: Larry Scheer
> > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:17 AM
> > To: Maxim Kozlovsky; dl-Cougar
> > Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;=20
> > Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> > Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> >=20
> > Yes, I do. At least this was the last release that Brian S.=20
> said was=20
> > "official."
> >=20
> > SSC-PROM> ver
> >=20
> > PROM_SIBYTE_CG : Cougar-prom-1.0.3 : Thu Jan 17 15:57:20 2008
> >=20
> > _____________________________________________
> > From: Maxim Kozlovsky
> > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 10:34 AM
> > To: Larry Scheer; dl-Cougar
> > Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;=20
> > Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> > Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> >=20
> > Hello,
> >=20
> > Did you have the latest prom (1.3) when trying to run the optimized=20
> > build? The txrx will crash if optimized build is run with=20
> the earlier=20
> > prom releases.
> >=20
> > Max
> >=20
> > _____________________________________________
> > From: Larry Scheer
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 10:43 PM
> > To: dl-Cougar
> > Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;=20
> > Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> > Subject: Status of today's build.
> >=20
> > Today we scrambled around to fix a problem with the SCSI=20
> message code=20
> > that manifested in problems with LUN label, volume create,=20
> etc. Change
> > 27822 fixed the problem; at least it appears that way with=20
> the debug=20
> > builds on both bobcat BSD and cougar systems.
> >=20
> > Jonathan checked in his changes this afternoon (27831) and=20
> there was=20
> > some question tonight whether everything still worked. I built from=20
> > the top of the tree (27835) and tested the debug build and=20
> everything=20
> > appears to be working with the debug build, both cougar and bobcat=20
> > BSD.
> >=20
> > However the cougar opt build from the top of the tree is=20
> not working.
> > I am seeing deadbeef messages in the console.
> > I also saw this when the opt build was booted from compact flash:
> >=20
> > Starting ONStor initial configuration utility:.
> > Setting up networking....
> > Configuring network interfaces...SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
> > run-parts: /etc/network/if-up.d/addroutes exited with return code 7
> > SIOCADDRT: File exists
> > run-parts: /etc/network/if-up.d/addroutes exited with return code 7=20
> > done.
> >=20
> > Just wanted to give everyone a status and answer some=20
> questions about=20
> > what works and what doesn't.
> >=20
> > Larry
> >=20
>=20
