X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C86F4C.B202866C@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:00:57 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: Lookup of 192.167.11.1
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:00:57 -0700
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0856E578@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080214121459.1a4c1d20@ripper.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Lookup of 192.167.11.1
Thread-Index: AchvRkZq4nogQL1fSM6e4ie1VVz8uwABlulA
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E28F61A@onstor-exch02.onstor.net><20080214113935.23de5a01@ripper.onstor.net><BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0856E524@onstor-exch02.onstor.net> <20080214121459.1a4c1d20@ripper.onstor.net>
From: "Eric Barrett" <eric.barrett@onstor.com>
To: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>

Well, hey, I'm all for fixing it!  I'll stop being Debbie Downer ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Sharp=20
Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 12:15 PM
To: Eric Barrett
Subject: Re: Lookup of 192.167.11.1

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 11:43:47 -0800 "Eric Barrett"
<eric.barrett@onstor.com> wrote:

> It would get forced onto the schedule, then passively-aggressively
> ignored.  In fact, I believe it already has been once, in 1.3.

Heh-heh.  I think that guy got fired.  But you know, if at first you
don't succeed.... ~:^)
