X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C8651B.4C6B6961@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:42:10 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: FW: Cougar build possible submittal 6 candidate
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:42:10 -0700
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9335@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: Cougar build possible submittal 6 candidate
Thread-Index: AchknUak6tX6spIbSDG8XqCzvXvoyQACGvIQABWftkUAAKTl0AACXihiAAAxqUQAAlDLYAACIt7A
From: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
To: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>,
	"Tim Gardner" <tim.gardner@onstor.com>

Tim,=20
   If you and/or Andy review my changes there is a very high probability
system upgrade will be in submittal 6 just as you told folks a while
back. ;-)

I wonder if anyone will notice sub 6 slipped a week?

-----Original Message-----
From: Vikas Saini=20
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 12:41 PM
To: Ken Renshaw; dl-QA
Cc: dl-Cougar
Subject: RE: Cougar build possible submittal 6 candidate

Ken,
   Looks like sub6 is DOA. Please move back all the filers to sub5
except g12r204 and g11r10. g11r204 is already on sub5...=20


Thanks
Vikas




-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Renshaw=20
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:31 AM
To: Ken Renshaw; Vikas Saini; dl-QA
Subject: RE: Cougar build possible submittal 6 candidate

I hit send a minute early, the soak systems are rebooting as is g14r10.
They'll be booted momentarily.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Renshaw
Sent: Fri 2/1/2008 11:25 AM
To: Vikas Saini; dl-QA
Cc: Tim Gardner; Larry Scheer
Subject: RE: Cougar build possible submittal 6 candidate
=20
The following QA filers and soak system are upgraded:

g9r204
g10r204
g12r204
g5r10
g6r10
g10r10
g11r10
g12r10
g14r10

The only one not upgraded is g11r204 as Vikas asked that I hold off so
Amit can finish debugging on it.

Let me know if you have any issues, thanks.

-Ken


-----Original Message-----
From: Vikas Saini
Sent: Fri 2/1/2008 10:19 AM
To: Ken Renshaw; Tim Gardner; Larry Scheer
Cc: dl-Cougar; dl-QA
Subject: RE: Cougar build possible submittal 6 candidate
=20
Ken,
    Lets upgrade all QA filers with this sub ASAP and send an email to
dl-cougar with submittal notes and respective paths.

Thanks
Vikas


-----Original Message-----
From: Ken Renshaw=20
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 9:59 AM
To: Tim Gardner; Larry Scheer; Vikas Saini
Cc: dl-Cougar; dl-QA
Subject: Re: Cougar build possible submittal 6 candidate

Yes indeed, thank you very much Larry.=20

Won't life be grand with flash,  system upgrade, etc.  working as I
agree dev shouldn't have needed to support the first half-dozen
submittals like this. We purposely didn't bug Larry until last afternoon
so as to give him room to work.=20

Thanks again for your time and efforts Larry.=20

-Ken

=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Tim Gardner
To: Larry Scheer; Ken Renshaw; Vikas Saini
CC: dl-Cougar; dl-QA
Sent: Thu Jan 31 23:40:20 2008
Subject: RE: Cougar build possible submittal 6 candidate

Larry,
=20
Thank you very much for doing this. Once again I apologize for having to
ask you to do this thus
pulling you away from your real work. Hopefully you got in you daily 10
minutes of work on
system upgrade before being diverted.
=20
Tim

________________________________

From: Larry Scheer
Sent: Thu 1/31/2008 10:40 PM
To: Ken Renshaw; Vikas Saini; Tim Gardner
Cc: dl-Cougar; dl-QA
Subject: Cougar build possible submittal 6 candidate



Ken, Vikas, Tim,

   I just finished doing some basic traffic tests with a build I did
this evening. Ken, in case you don't know about this, Tim and Vikas came
to me and ask if I could put together a build to use as a possible
submittal candidate. At the time the top of the tree wasn't building and
there were rumors flying around that it wouldn't work even if it did get
built. Since I had several successful builds yesterday and the day
before I decided to create a build from a changelist that was close to
the time I last verified a build worked.

I created a new P4 client and synced to change # 27520. I built all of
the product variants and loaded a cougar debug build on g4r5 and
successfully ran the basic build verification tests with NFS and CIFS
traffic.

I also installed this build on g10r204 and that system is up and running
with this version. It doesn't have any volumes configured and only the
management vsvr is present. Given this I ran the basic tests on my
system g4r5.

I posted this build to /n/Build-Trees/R4.0.0.0/R4.0.0.0DEV-013108 it is
there for you to use if you want.

Let me know if there is anything more you would like me to do for you.

Larry









