X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Received: by onstor-exch02.onstor.net 
	id <01C861E3.991074C9@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>; Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:25:53 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
Subject: RE: interesting problem with CF and our production rootfs
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 12:25:53 -0700
Message-ID: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C931C@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080128112424.2e137231@ripper.onstor.net>
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
Thread-Topic: interesting problem with CF and our production rootfs
Thread-Index: Achh42OsU6muuYg+SyS5BSWIEPDlZAAACodw
From: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
To: "Andy Sharp" <andy.sharp@onstor.com>

It's on my to-do list.=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy Sharp=20
Sent: Monday, January 28, 2008 11:24 AM
To: Larry Scheer
Subject: Re: interesting problem with CF and our production rootfs

OK, sure, but this needs to be fixed.

On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 11:05:33 -0800 "Larry Scheer"
<larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:

> I have no problem running dpkg -l.
>=20
>=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp=20
> Sent: Friday, January 25, 2008 3:55 AM
> To: Larry Scheer
> Subject: Re: interesting problem with CF and our production rootfs
>=20
> Since your packages file is broken I can't tell what packages are
> installed on our rootfs.  That problem has to be fixed.
>=20
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:31:18 -0800 "Larry Scheer"
> <larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:
>=20
> > Right away I thought about our version of libc6. Does your "working"
> > rootfs have our libc6 or the unmodified one?
> >=20
> > Do you have any packages installed that our rootfs doesn't have?
> >=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andy Sharp=20
> > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 6:10 PM
> > To: Larry Scheer
> > Subject: interesting problem with CF and our production rootfs
> >=20
> > I originally sent this to larry@onstor.com.  Apparently there is no
> > such thing.  So now I'm resending to your actual email address in
> > the hopes that Exgrunge likes that better.  Sigh.
> >=20
> >=20
> > Hi Larry,
> >=20
> > It seems there is a bug whereby the pccard status interrupt is
> > not being sent/received.  I spent most of my time in the office
> > today isolating it to our production rootfs.  It works as desired
> > with my hand made rootfs which I still have knocking around.
> >=20
> > That's as far as I got, but something about our rootfs is not as it
> > should be.  Keep in mind that this is w/o running anything started
> > by pm: I disabled pm so the system boots up but doesn't run pm or
> > any of the stuff that pm runs.  So it runs our init scripts, and
> > whatever all else is different.  I just don't know what the culprit
> > is yet.  If anything springs to mind, let me know.
> >=20
> > a
