AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20070802122747.59dd09f5@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<ken.renshaw@onstor.com>,<ed.kwan@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02F3D5BA@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:27:56 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Ken Renshaw" <ken.renshaw@onstor.com>
Cc: "Ed Kwan" <ed.kwan@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Branch for 3.0.1  (RE: Please respin patch 3.0.0.4)
Message-ID: <20070802122756.619c7c0e@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02F3D5BA@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E04D20994@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02F3D5B1@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E04D20A5F@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E02F3D5BA@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Cool beans.

Cheers,

a

On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 12:22:16 -0700 "Ken Renshaw"
<ken.renshaw@onstor.com> wrote:

> Hello again.
> 
> The branch has been created:
> 
> //depot/R3_0_1_rel/...
> 
> Parent is R3_0_X_rel to keep integrations easy for this patch line.
> Code base is currently 3.0.0.4, with the Tools/version* files updated
> to 3.0.1.0. I'll be integrating the couple of dozen fixes slated so
> far for 3.0.1.0 over the next day or so, depending on the conflicts
> that arise.
> 
> Let me know if you need anything else, thanks.
> 
> -Ken
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Kwan
> Sent: Thu 8/2/2007 11:32 AM
> To: Ken Renshaw
> Cc: Andy Sharp
> Subject: Branch for 3.0.1  (RE: Please respin patch 3.0.0.4)
>  
> Yes, it will be good to have a separate 3.0.1.0 branch.  Andy & I
> were talking about it yesterday afternoon; he is planning to improve
> the installation code/script for 3.0.1.0.
> 
> > So like for 22x, we'll either need to create a 301 or 300 branch if
> > we think there will be many patches in the time it takes to get 301
> > out.
> 
> 
