AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E04DF9726@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:52:52 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Please review
Message-ID: <20070802145252.26a47d0d@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E04DF9726@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E04D200F3@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<20070802144227.44d81985@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E04DF9726@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

good to go

On Thu, 2 Aug 2007 14:48:41 -0700 "Maxim Kozlovsky"
<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com> wrote:

> Ok, you are right, I did not intend to change the callers. Changed the
> callers back to call the original 
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Maxim Kozlovsky
> >Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2007 2:45 PM
> >To: Andy Sharp
> >Subject: RE: Please review
> >
> >
> >>nfx-tree/code/ssc-authentication/auth-cifs.c
> >>
> >>     why bother to convert set_fd_block() to use the new api
> >> function if you are then just going to change all the places it
> >> was called to use the new api function?  can't you just remove
> set_fd_block()?
> >[MK]
> >It does some error reporting which may occasionally be useful (that
> >is
> how
> >I found that it does not work).
> 
