AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20070817125549.6b57ab9b@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<warren.gale@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0507DEEB@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 12:58:26 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Warren Gale" <warren.gale@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Arrow keys in PROM
Message-ID: <20070817125826.3ba7c809@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0507DEEB@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0507DEEB@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Well, I'll have to scrape my jaw off the dirty carpet here in
Camphell.  I just tried the ctrl sequences, and sure enough they are
there.

Cheers,

a

On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 11:53:46 -0700 "Warren Gale"
<warren.gale@onstor.com> wrote:

> Andy,
> 
>    Ok so I went and looked...  Well the history stuff is already
> there.
> 
>    CTRL P  previous  CTRL N next, CTRL B  back, and CTRL F forward.
> 
>    CTRL H back space and erase or backspace key.
>
> Anyway I added the escape sequences to look for the arrow keys. So now
> that works also.

So you're saying you can add escape sequence interpreters to just do
the same thing, that's so awesome.  I take back all those bad things I
said about PMON ~:^)

> Please review the changes to the 2 files located at
> "/n/users/warreng/bc_proms/code2review" which have the
> originals and new files.  Looks like I'll be able to get it into this
> next release :-)

Use the 'p4 change' command to capture the changed files into a change
list (without checking them in).  Then send me the changelist number.

>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Warren
> 
>  
> 
> PS I'm re-visiting the memory allocation stuff again.
> 
>  
> 
