AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20070823094035.1a9ea186@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>,<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E051AEF11@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 09:40:54 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Jonathan Goldick" <jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>
Cc: "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Linux question
Message-ID: <20070823094054.490bbee1@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E051AEF11@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E051AEF11@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I can only assume they have personal problems.  Probably some kind of
Solaris name compatibility nightmare.

On Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:57:55 -0700 "Jonathan Goldick"
<jonathan.goldick@onstor.com> wrote:

> In
> http://docs.sun.com/source/817-5625-10/Linux_Data_and_Management.html
> section 7.1.4 they make the statement
> 
> *	Physical interfaces 
> 	These are the standard physical Gigabit Ethernet interfaces on
> the blade. On a B100x blade, these are snet0 and snet1. On a B200x
> blade these are snet0 and snet1, and snet2 and snet3. 
> 	To provide consistency with interface order, the standard
> physical Ethernet interfaces have been renamed from "eth" to "snet". 
> 
> Do either of you known why they could mean about why they renamed eth
> to snet?
> 
