AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20071016110546.7b3a0630@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<larry.scheer@onstor.com>,<tim.gardner@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E042EFFDE@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 11:06:27 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
Cc: "Tim Gardner" <tim.gardner@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Progress report on Linux system Upgrade
Message-ID: <20071016110627.6291c2f7@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E042EFFDE@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E042EFFDE@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Larry,

Hey, that's good news!  I'm pleased with your excellent progress!

-bob (not Bob)

On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:51:50 -0700 "Larry Scheer"
<larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:

> 
> Based on integral subsystem considerations, the interrelation of
> system technologies requires considerable systems analysis and
> trade-off studies to arrive at the greater fight-worthiness concept.
> Without going into the technical details, a large proportion of
> interface coordination communication maximizes the probability of
> project success, yet minimizes cost and time required for the
> anticipated fourth-generation equipment. In summary, the independent
> functional principle adds explicit performance limits to the
> subsystem compatibility testing. In theory, the product configuration
> baseline is further compounded when taking into account the
> sophisticated hardware. It is assumed that the incorporation of
> additional mission constraints must utilize and be functionally
> interwoven with the preliminary qualification limit. As you can
> clearly see expectations are being met with utmost dedication to
> process requirements specified in the PLC phased review plan.
> 
> Larry
