AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20070119120525.5465d50c@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<ken.renshaw@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E013361FB@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 12:05:40 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Ken Renshaw" <ken.renshaw@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: linux-source namespace protected??
Message-ID: <20070119120540.0f529a29@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E013361FB@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E022155F3@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E013361FB@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Sometimes the best software designs are arrived at by analysing
previous imperfect ones.  I'd at least like to see what direction his
stuff was heading in.  I'm curious as to why he would delete it all
though.  But is sounds like I can sync to a particular date and be able
to get it.  Can you tell what day it was he deleted them all?

Cheers,

a



On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 18:29:23 -0800 "Ken Renshaw"
<ken.renshaw@onstor.com> wrote:

> That he did...sadly it looks like there's no real changes checked in.
> If you look at the descriptions of the changelists below they simply
> add linux sources, delete them, re-add a new one, then delete that
> one...and only left an empty placeholder. Is one of his
> machines/homedirs/disks/anything laying around still that we can
> glean more state from? Thanks Larry, I just hope we don't have to
> totally revinvent the wheel, but given Dan's legacy maybe that's a
> good thing ;) Let me know if I can help with anything, thanks. -Ken
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Larry Scheer
> Sent: Thu 1/18/2007 6:20 PM
> To: Ken Renshaw; Andy Sharp
> Subject: RE: linux-source namespace protected??
> 
> 
> 
> Wow, Dan sure did some odd things. I guess we can sync to a change
> list to get some idea of what was done.
> 
> Since he was the project lead I didn't check on the details of what
> he was doing.
> 
>  
> 
> Larry
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Ken Renshaw 
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 6:14 PM
> To: Larry Scheer; Andy Sharp
> Subject: RE: linux-source namespace protected??
> 
>  
> 
> Really? That's surprising considering all the effort that went into
> it. I was looking through the //depot/linux_source/... changes:
> 
>  
> 
> [build@k2 linux]$ p4 changes //depot/linux_source/...
> Change 14778 on 2005/03/24 by perforce@dans-linux 'reviewed by: kenr '
> Change 14777 on 2005/03/24 by perforce@dans-linux 'reviewed by: kenr '
> Change 14776 on 2005/03/24 by perforce@dans-linux 'reviewed by: kenr
> remove base k' Change 14556 on 2005/03/09 by perforce@dans-linux
> 'reviewed by: kenr upgraded to l' Change 14555 on 2005/03/09 by
> perforce@dans-linux 'reviewed by: kenr backing out l' Change 14366 on
> 2005/02/18 by perforce@dans-linux 'reviewed by: kenr linux-2.6.10 '
> Change 14361 on 2005/02/18 by kenr@build-k2-depot 'Sandbox for Dan to
> start Linux '
> 
>  
> 
> and they seem to be just Dan checking in the linux source, then
> backing it all out, then doing that over again. Puzzling.
> 
>  
> 
> -Ken
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Larry Scheer
> Sent: Thu 1/18/2007 6:07 PM
> To: Ken Renshaw; Andy Sharp
> Subject: RE: linux-source namespace protected??
> 
> Yes, in the linux directory, at the same level as openbsd directory,
> you will find a handful of  files that were checked in. These files
> appear to be the updates to net-eee code that was done for the linux
> project.
> 
>  
> 
> I don't know how much other code, if any,  that was worked on in the
> previous porting effort was checked into perforce. 
> 
>  
> 
> Larry
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Ken Renshaw 
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 5:43 PM
> To: Andrew Sharp
> Cc: Larry Scheer
> Subject: RE: linux-source namespace protected??
> 
>  
> 
> Larry worked on this project, but I believe we ended up with the
> linux tree under $BRANCH/linux for releases starting with 1.3.3, so
> you can pick it up from here if you'd like:
> 
>  
> 
> //depot/FB-LAMBORGHINI/linux/...
> 
>  
> 
> FB-DELOREAN and //depot/main also contain the directory, whos
> contents are:
> 
>  
> 
> [build@k2 trees]$ ls FB-LAMBORGHINI/linux
> arch  drivers  include  init  kernel  net
> [build@k2 trees]$
> 
> Good luck Andy!
> 
>  
> 
> -Ken
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Andrew Sharp [mailto:andy.sharp@onstor.com]
> Sent: Thu 1/18/2007 5:25 PM
> To: Ken Renshaw
> Cc: Larry Scheer
> Subject: Re: linux-source namespace protected??
> 
> Perfidiot: Oh, huh, yeah.
> 
> Well, I fixed the name of the directory *doh* and now I get:
> 
> ~/src/linux_source$ p4 sync ...
> //depot/linux_source/placeholder#1 - added
> as /homes/andys/src/linux_source/placeholder
> ripper:~/src/linux_source$
> 
> That's it, only one file?  Now what am I doing wrong?
> 
> That's what shows up in p-web-force too, so ... am I looking in the
> wrong place again?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> a
> 
> 
>  On Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:17:46 -0800 "Ken Renshaw"
> <ken.renshaw@onstor.com> wrote:
> 
> > linux_source versus linux-source perhaps?
> >
> > 
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
> > To: Larry Scheer; Ken Renshaw
> > Sent: Thu Jan 18 17:08:02 2007
> > Subject: linux-source namespace protected??
> >
> > Howdy folks,
> >
> > It looks like the linux-source directory in perforce is protected?
> > I can't get to it.  Can someone please un-protect it?  Molto-gracie.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > a
> 
