AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20071129131814.65c82bf1@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<sudheesh.nair@onstor.com>,<joshua.goldenhar@onstor.com>,<david.crispin@onstor.com>,<huy.duong@onstor.com>,<john.rogers@onstor.com>,<rich.lareau@onstor.com>,<dl-cstech@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E06D5CB0F@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 13:18:26 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Sudheesh Nair" <sudheesh.nair@onstor.com>
Cc: "Joshua Goldenhar" <joshua.goldenhar@onstor.com>, "David Crispin"
 <david.crispin@onstor.com>, "Huy Duong" <huy.duong@onstor.com>, "John
 Rogers" <john.rogers@onstor.com>, "Rich LaReau" <rich.lareau@onstor.com>,
 "dl-cstech" <dl-cstech@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: It was the year, 1601
Message-ID: <20071129131826.621ca267@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E06D5CB0F@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E064D0F4D@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E06D5CABC@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E06D5CACE@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E06D5CAFB@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E06D5CB0F@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<crack>

ouch.

Actually, it was Paul Allen who is responsible for this and he has
already apologized.  For this and for the back slash.

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 12:23:15 -0800 "Sudheesh Nair"
<sudheesh.nair@onstor.com> wrote:

> Josh..you stepped on it and now asking for it ..I saw Andy removing
> his neck brace with some purpose ..
>  
> Regards
> Sudheesh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joshua Goldenhar 
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:15 PM
> To: Sudheesh Nair; David Crispin; Huy Duong; John Rogers; Rich LaReau;
> dl-cstech
> Subject: RE: It was the year, 1601
> 
> Yeah - Ha! Windows is better! It can display files that were created
> more than 300 years before those silly Unix/Linux systems!
> 
> Who says Microsoft doesn't innovate?!?
> 
> -Josh
> 
> Josh Goldenhar
> Phone: 408 963 2408, Cell: 408 547 7693
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sudheesh Nair 
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 11:45 AM
> To: David Crispin; Huy Duong; John Rogers; Rich LaReau; dl-cstech
> Subject: RE: It was the year, 1601
> 
> Unix epoch time is from 1/1/1970, but Windows time stamps are added
> units of 100 ns from 1/1/1601
> 
> Regards
> Sudheesh
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Crispin 
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 11:33 AM
> To: Huy Duong; John Rogers; Rich LaReau; dl-cstech
> Subject: RE: It was the year, 1601
> 
> I thought the epoch was 1/1/1970.
> 
> 
> David Crispin
> Technical Services Manager
> 
> ONStor, Inc.
> office: +44(0)118 963 5866
> mobile: +44(0)7940 547 895
> 
> 
> david.crispin@onstor.com
> http://www.onstor.com
>  	
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Huy Duong 
> Sent: 29 November 2007 19:30
> To: John Rogers; Rich LaReau; dl-cstech
> Subject: Re: It was the year, 1601
> 
> Its the epoch time.
> -----------------------------------------
> Huy Duong
> ONStor Strategic Support Account Manager 
> Phone 408.963.2478 
> Cell    408.431.6803 
> http://support.onstor.com/
> Sent From My Blackberry
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Rogers
> To: Rich LaReau; dl-cstech
> Sent: Thu Nov 29 11:29:00 2007
> Subject: RE: It was the year, 1601
> 
> Sounds very very familiar, but I cant seem to track down an email or
> bug on it.
> 
> I thought we saw this first during our implementation of DST for 2007.
> its something to do with the earliest date that CIFS protocol is able
> to display.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rich LaReau 
> Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 10:34 AM
> To: dl-cstech
> Subject: It was the year, 1601
> 
> 
> I have a custom application that runs off of a bootable CDrom.  If I
> write to a cifs share I get a creation time stamp of the correct
> calendar day, but the year is 1601.  Can anybody tell me what causes
> that?
> 
> Thanks,
> Rich
