AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080111160050.171099a0@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>,<joshua.goldenhar@onstor.com>,<dl-Cougar@onstor.com>,<fay.chong@onstor.com>,<jobi.ariyamannil@onstor.com>,<john.rogers@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E079AC594@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:00:52 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>
Cc: "Joshua Goldenhar" <joshua.goldenhar@onstor.com>, "dl-Cougar"
 <dl-Cougar@onstor.com>, "Fay Chong" <fay.chong@onstor.com>, "Jobi
 Ariyamannil" <jobi.ariyamannil@onstor.com>, "John Rogers"
 <john.rogers@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: spec run on cougar
Message-ID: <20080111160052.600c8e8b@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E079AC594@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0789BCAF@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0789BE4D@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0789C0D0@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E079AC594@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Su-weet!

Cougar may be the best thing that ever happened to bobcat.


On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:36:03 -0800 "Maxim Kozlovsky"
<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com> wrote:

> We have been able to run until 5k/sec ops before the crash today:
> 
>            1000     996    20.7   298759  300 3 T   10140416   4 32  2
> 2 3.0
>            2000    2027    16.6   608217  300 3 T   20280832   4 32  2
> 2 3.0
>            3000    3070    10.7   917990  299 3 T   30421248   4 32  2
> 2 3.0
>            4000    4025     7.9  1207439  300 3 T   40561664   4 32  2
> 2 3.0
>            5000    5046     6.1  1513956  300 3 T   50702080   4 32  2
> 2 3.0
> 
> This is debug build so don't worry about the latency. Being able to
> pass through the file creation phase is already encouraging.
> 
> Surprisingly enough the crash was caused by a previously unknown EVM
> bug and had nothing to do with the new hardware.
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Joshua Goldenhar 
> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 9:33 AM
> To: Maxim Kozlovsky; dl-Cougar; Fay Chong; Jobi Ariyamannil; John
> Rogers Subject: RE: spec run on cougar
> 
> Woohoo! Alright, let's go for four minutes! ;-)
> 
> But seriously, I think this is a great approach.
> 
> -Josh
> 
> Josh Goldenhar
> Phone: 408 963 2408, Cell: 408 547 7693
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Maxim Kozlovsky 
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 4:50 PM
> To: Maxim Kozlovsky; dl-Cougar; Fay Chong; Jobi Ariyamannil; John
> Rogers Subject: RE: spec run on cougar
> 
> Well as I said, the cougar has lasted about 3 minutes of file creation
> phase.
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Maxim Kozlovsky 
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2008 1:53 PM
> To: dl-Cougar; Fay Chong; Jobi Ariyamannil; John Rogers
> Subject: spec run on cougar
> 
> There seems to be some confusion on why we are running the spec on
> cougar and who should be doing it. At this time we are not really
> expecting it to succeed or produce any meaningful results, so it does
> not make sense for the QA or qualifications to be doing it. It is
> likely going to crash or fail or run slow, and then you'll have to
> call somebody in dev anyway. So if you don't mind I am going to take
> the cougar spec environment and run the spec myself and fix whatever
> problems we are going find.
>  
