AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080128112518.5df5dae1@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<larry.scheer@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9311@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:26:22 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: interesting problem with CF and our production rootfs
Message-ID: <20080128112622.102258db@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9311@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <20080124180932.28beed45@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9311@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Diffing the package lists, I have a few notes.  One note is that I
noticed how good a job you've done keeping the package list short.
That's not always easy as I'm sure you know.

Here are my notes:

we are installing gawk and mawk packages, we only need mawk.

pciutils should be in debug rootfs

we should be able to get rid of 'nano' package; 'vim-tiny' and
'vim-common' should be all that's necessary (as well as 'ed') for
editing.  i'm guessing nano gets pulled in by some initial dependency,
but then we should be able to axe it.  if it's hard or fiddly, then
forget it.

please add the 'pcmciautils' package, which requires 'libsysfs2'


On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 18:31:18 -0800 "Larry Scheer"
<larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:

> Right away I thought about our version of libc6. Does your "working"
> rootfs have our libc6 or the unmodified one?
> 
> Do you have any packages installed that our rootfs doesn't have?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2008 6:10 PM
> To: Larry Scheer
> Subject: interesting problem with CF and our production rootfs
> 
> I originally sent this to larry@onstor.com.  Apparently there is no
> such thing.  So now I'm resending to your actual email address in the
> hopes that Exgrunge likes that better.  Sigh.
> 
> 
> Hi Larry,
> 
> It seems there is a bug whereby the pccard status interrupt is
> not being sent/received.  I spent most of my time in the office today
> isolating it to our production rootfs.  It works as desired with my
> hand made rootfs which I still have knocking around.
> 
> That's as far as I got, but something about our rootfs is not as it
> should be.  Keep in mind that this is w/o running anything started by
> pm: I disabled pm so the system boots up but doesn't run pm or any of
> the stuff that pm runs.  So it runs our init scripts, and whatever all
> else is different.  I just don't know what the culprit is yet.  If
> anything springs to mind, let me know.
> 
> a
