AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080131115838.54889ff7@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<brian.stark@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 12:02:47 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Brian Stark <brian.stark@onstor.com>
Subject: cougar-heavy or jaguar?
Message-ID: <20080131120247.34237be3@ripper.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

This seems like a perfectly suitable processor for cougar-2 or jaguar.
12 cores, 900MHz, TCP acceleration, hardware checksumming, integrated
GigE, PCIe, etc.  A single chip could house management, FP and TXRX
functionality.  Would be S-X compatible and so on, plus very low power.
I'm guessing you've looked at this one in the past, what did you think?

Cheers,

a

http://www.caviumnetworks.com/OCTEON-Plus_CN57XX.html