AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080201135002.03cded08@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<tim.gardner@onstor.com>,<charissa.willard@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0812AC37@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:53:19 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Tim Gardner" <tim.gardner@onstor.com>
Cc: Charissa Willard <charissa.willard@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: NCM blocker defect 22089
Message-ID: <20080201135319.6d769d1c@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0812AC37@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0812AC37@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Is nfxsh always invoked with -c or -s when run for these purposes?  By
"these" I mean ncm/sssccc.

I assigned the bug to me.

Thanks,

a

On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:30:37 -0800 "Tim Gardner"
<tim.gardner@onstor.com> wrote:

>  
> 
> Andy,
> 
>  
> 
> Can you please look into this. This is a blocker for QA.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
>  
> 
> Tim
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Charissa Willard 
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 12:04 PM
> To: Tim Gardner
> Subject: RE: NCM blocker defect 22089
> 
>  
> 
> Tim,
> 
>  
> 
> In the main loop in vtysh, we call get_device_names to set compact
> flash device path names. We're getting back an error when we get the
> information back used to build the tree view and cluster summary
> page. 
> 
>  
> 
> <cmd-Response>
>     <cmdId>444,2</cmdId>
>     <sessionId>5162099595037048956</sessionId>
>     <rtCode>0</rtCode>
>     <result>get_device_names: failed to stat /dev/sda1 (2), perhaps
> you have only one compact flash card
> !?!?
>  
> -Charissa
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Vikas Saini 
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:46 AM
> To: Charissa Willard; Tim Gardner
> Subject: RE: NCM blocker defect 22089
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks Charrisa for jumping on this :-)... 
> 
>  
> 
> Vikas
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Charissa Willard 
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:44 AM
> To: Vikas Saini; Tim Gardner
> Cc: dl-QA
> Subject: RE: NCM blocker defect 22089
> 
>  
> 
> Yes I know. I'm looking into it.
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Vikas Saini 
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:43 AM
> To: Tim Gardner; Charissa Willard
> Cc: dl-QA
> Subject: FW: NCM blocker defect 22089
> 
>  
> 
> Tim,
> 
>    We need to get this thing resolved ASAP. NCM behavior is so
> unpredictable that it is almost unusable.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Vikas
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: John Keiffer 
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:41 AM
> To: dl-QA
> Cc: Charissa Willard
> Subject: NCM blocker defect 22089
> 
>  
> 
> NCM is not usable with Sub 6. You can log in, but most screens will
> not be usable...
> 
>  
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> John Keiffer
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
