AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080205102017.0322e77d@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<brian.deforest@onstor.com>,<sripal.surendiran@onstor.com>,<sudharsan@onstor.com>,<tim.gardner@onstor.com>,<charissa.willard@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0812B688@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:20:46 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Brian DeForest" <brian.deforest@onstor.com>
Cc: "Sripal Surendiran (HCL)" <sripal.surendiran@onstor.com>, "Sudharsan
 Srinivasan" <sudharsan@onstor.com>, "Tim Gardner" <tim.gardner@onstor.com>,
 "Charissa Willard" <charissa.willard@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Blockers in Cougar FTI
Message-ID: <20080205102046.5805e981@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0812B688@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04EC247AA@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E080584B9@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<20080130192428.32ec08b4@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0812B688@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

To be honest, I really don't know what we're calling sub6 or sub7 any
more.  But all that should be in any build done this week.

On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:46:08 -0800 "Brian DeForest"
<brian.deforest@onstor.com> wrote:

> More specifically, is flash boot, 'system upgrade', and 'system copy'
> supported in sub6?  Sub7?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian DeForest 
> Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 3:50 PM
> To: Andy Sharp
> Cc: Sripal Surendiran (HCL); Sudharsan Srinivasan; Tim Gardner;
> Charissa Willard
> Subject: RE: Blockers in Cougar FTI
> 
> Is this available in this week's sub6 build?   Tim thought it might
> be. Or do they need to wait for sub7?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 7:24 PM
> To: Brian DeForest
> Cc: Sripal Surendiran (HCL); Sudharsan Srinivasan; Tim Gardner;
> Charissa Willard
> Subject: Re: Blockers in Cougar FTI
> 
> There is nothing to be done until the next submittal is out, which
> will support compact flash.  Then we have to start getting CF cards
> into the filers.  So check back again about this time next week.
> 
> On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:19:41 -0800 "Brian DeForest"
> <brian.deforest@onstor.com> wrote:
> 
> > I believe flash boot is now implemented.   
> >  
> > Tim/Andy, can you provide access to a system with flash boot?
> > 
> > ________________________________
> > 
> > From: Sripal Surendiran (HCL)
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 8:17 AM
> > To: Brian DeForest; Sudharsan Srinivasan
> > Subject: Blockers in Cougar FTI
> > 
> > 
> > Brian,
> >  
> > Following are the blocker issues in Cougar FTI.
> >  
> > 1. I face issues when I execute dhcp client binary in Linux. NG
> > seems to hang after running the dhcp client. I believe this has to
> > be fixed in the kernel as mentioned by Andy. This will block our 
> > implementation.
> > 2. Cougar system currently doesn't support flash. It boots up using 
> > tftp method. Hence I may not be able to test "Load configurations
> > from
> 
> > secondary flash".
> >  
> > Regards,
> > Sripal.
