AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080205115857.459ff33b@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<larry.scheer@onstor.com>,<tim.gardner@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9349@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:59:04 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Larry Scheer" <larry.scheer@onstor.com>
Cc: "Tim Gardner" <tim.gardner@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Blockers in Cougar FTI
Message-ID: <20080205115904.1edbd7a7@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9349@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <20080205114024.609a3476@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E056C9349@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Perhaps you can expand on what you mean by that?  For example, I saw no
defect with that description in it.


On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:50:50 -0800 "Larry Scheer"
<larry.scheer@onstor.com> wrote:

> So system copy init being complete broken on BSD systems is WAD?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 11:40 AM
> To: Tim Gardner
> Cc: Larry Scheer
> Subject: Re: Blockers in Cougar FTI
> 
> I only saw one which I marked as WAD yesterday.
> 
> On Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:30:38 -0800 "Tim Gardner"
> <tim.gardner@onstor.com> wrote:
> 
> > Larry was filing some defects on flash related commands such as
> > system copy init. Will fixes for these be available in sub 7?
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andy Sharp
> > > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 10:21 AM
> > > To: Brian DeForest
> > > Cc: Sripal Surendiran (HCL); Sudharsan Srinivasan; Tim Gardner;
> > Charissa
> > > Willard
> > > Subject: Re: Blockers in Cougar FTI
> > > 
> > > To be honest, I really don't know what we're calling sub6 or sub7
> > > any more.  But all that should be in any build done this week.
> > > 
> > > On Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:46:08 -0800 "Brian DeForest"
> > > <brian.deforest@onstor.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > More specifically, is flash boot, 'system upgrade', and 'system
> > copy'
> > > > supported in sub6?  Sub7?
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Brian DeForest
> > > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 3:50 PM
> > > > To: Andy Sharp
> > > > Cc: Sripal Surendiran (HCL); Sudharsan Srinivasan; Tim Gardner;
> > > > Charissa Willard
> > > > Subject: RE: Blockers in Cougar FTI
> > > >
> > > > Is this available in this week's sub6 build?   Tim thought it
> > > > might be. Or do they need to wait for sub7?
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Andy Sharp
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 7:24 PM
> > > > To: Brian DeForest
> > > > Cc: Sripal Surendiran (HCL); Sudharsan Srinivasan; Tim Gardner;
> > > > Charissa Willard
> > > > Subject: Re: Blockers in Cougar FTI
> > > >
> > > > There is nothing to be done until the next submittal is out,
> > > > which will support compact flash.  Then we have to start
> > > > getting CF cards into the filers.  So check back again about
> > > > this time next week.
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 30 Jan 2008 16:19:41 -0800 "Brian DeForest"
> > > > <brian.deforest@onstor.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I believe flash boot is now implemented.
> > > > >
> > > > > Tim/Andy, can you provide access to a system with flash boot?
> > > > >
> > > > > ________________________________
> > > > >
> > > > > From: Sripal Surendiran (HCL)
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2008 8:17 AM
> > > > > To: Brian DeForest; Sudharsan Srinivasan
> > > > > Subject: Blockers in Cougar FTI
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Brian,
> > > > >
> > > > > Following are the blocker issues in Cougar FTI.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1. I face issues when I execute dhcp client binary in Linux.
> > > > > NG seems to hang after running the dhcp client. I believe
> > > > > this has to be fixed in the kernel as mentioned by Andy. This
> > > > > will block our implementation.
> > > > > 2. Cougar system currently doesn't support flash. It boots up
> > using
> > > > > tftp method. Hence I may not be able to test "Load
> > > > > configurations from
> > > >
> > > > > secondary flash".
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Sripal.
