AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080214144932.26128c48@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<warren.gale@onstor.com>,<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>,<larry.scheer@onstor.com>,<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>,<dl-Cougar@onstor.com>,<jobi.ariyamannil@onstor.com>,<vikas.saini@onstor.com>,<ken.renshaw@onstor.com>,<paul.hammer@onstor.com>,<ed.kwan@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0856E634@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:50:22 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Warren Gale" <warren.gale@onstor.com>
Cc: "Sandrine Boulanger" <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>, "Larry Scheer"
 <larry.scheer@onstor.com>, "Maxim Kozlovsky" <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com>,
 "dl-Cougar" <dl-Cougar@onstor.com>, "Jobi Ariyamannil"
 <jobi.ariyamannil@onstor.com>, "Vikas Saini" <vikas.saini@onstor.com>, "Ken
 Renshaw" <ken.renshaw@onstor.com>, "Paul Hammer" <paul.hammer@onstor.com>,
 "Ed Kwan" <ed.kwan@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Status of today's build.
Message-ID: <20080214145022.4c95aa7e@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0856E634@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0856E52F@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E05C7424C@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0856E634@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I'm sorry, but Sandrine is completely correct, there never should have
been two different 1.0.3 proms.  That was a no-no.

On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 14:10:36 -0800 "Warren Gale"
<warren.gale@onstor.com> wrote:

> Since the PROMs have moved under the dev tree, any developer could
> make their own proms
> which would have the current "tree-name" inserted in the version
> string. With Wiki page build and upgrade instructions,
> anyone could have done an update with a non-released version.
> Notes were kept by Rick based on Change List numbers, which I am
> looking for at this point.
> As far as I know there was pro-active work done to update all QA and
> dev systems.
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Sandrine Boulanger 
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 1:43 PM
> To: Warren Gale; Larry Scheer; Maxim Kozlovsky; dl-Cougar
> Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw; Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> 
> Also, how come there would be multiple versions of 1.0.3 proms, and
> why there is no pro-active update when new proms are available, along
> with some notes that explain what has changed? 
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Warren Gale 
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:58 AM
> To: Larry Scheer; Maxim Kozlovsky; dl-Cougar
> Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;
> Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> 
> Ok, at this point we need to have physical consoles attached to TXRX ,
> FP, and SSC, 
> to be able to do the upgrade.
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Larry Scheer 
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:44 AM
> To: Maxim Kozlovsky; dl-Cougar
> Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;
> Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> 
> Yes indeed! My answer was right there in my email. Notice the the TXRX
> prompt : "DEBUG-TXRX0:0 >" The TXRX is crashed!
> 
> To be redundant... I need new PROM images!
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Maxim Kozlovsky 
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:40 AM
> To: Larry Scheer; dl-Cougar
> Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;
> Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> 
> Actually that problem with the optimized build was not fixed until
> January 17, so your prom can not be right.
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Larry Scheer 
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:30 AM
> To: Larry Scheer; Maxim Kozlovsky; dl-Cougar
> Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;
> Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> 
> I'm talking to Warren. He pointed out that I need to look at the TXRX
> and FP PROM. Here is the versions from the other processors:
> 
> FP0:1 > ver
> ver
> 
> NFP_FP : R4.0.0.DEV-CG-021308 : Wed Feb 13 23:47:44 2008
> PROM_SIBYTE_CG : Cougar-prom-1.0.3 : Thu Dec 20 11:25:51 2007
> 
> DEBUG-TXRX0:0 > ver
> ver
> 
> NFP_TXRX : R4.0.0.DEV-CG-021308 : Wed Feb 13 23:51:17 2008
> PROM_SIBYTE_CG : Cougar-prom-1.0.3 : Thu Dec 20 11:25:51 2007
> 
> Warren says he thinks I am ok, even though it is not the latest 1.0.3.
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Larry Scheer 
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 11:17 AM
> To: Maxim Kozlovsky; dl-Cougar
> Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;
> Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> 
> Yes, I do. At least this was the last release that Brian S. said was
> "official."
> 
> SSC-PROM> ver
> 
> PROM_SIBYTE_CG : Cougar-prom-1.0.3 : Thu Jan 17 15:57:20 2008
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Maxim Kozlovsky 
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 10:34 AM
> To: Larry Scheer; dl-Cougar
> Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;
> Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> Subject: RE: Status of today's build.
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Did you have the latest prom (1.3) when trying to run the optimized
> build? The txrx will crash if optimized build is run with the earlier
> prom releases.
> 
> Max
> 
> _____________________________________________
> From: Larry Scheer 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 10:43 PM
> To: dl-Cougar
> Cc: Jobi Ariyamannil; Sandrine Boulanger; Vikas Saini; Ken Renshaw;
> Paul Hammer; Ed Kwan
> Subject: Status of today's build.
> 
> Today we scrambled around to fix a problem with the SCSI message code
> that manifested in problems with LUN label, volume create, etc. Change
> 27822 fixed the problem; at least it appears that way with the debug
> builds on both bobcat BSD and cougar systems.
> 
> Jonathan checked in his changes this afternoon (27831) and there was
> some question tonight whether everything still worked. I built from
> the top of the tree (27835) and tested the debug build and everything
> appears to be working with the debug build, both cougar and bobcat
> BSD.
> 
> However the cougar opt build from the top of the tree is not working.
> I am seeing deadbeef messages in the console.
> I also saw this when the opt build was booted from compact flash:
> 
> Starting ONStor initial configuration utility:.
> Setting up networking....
> Configuring network interfaces...SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable
> run-parts: /etc/network/if-up.d/addroutes exited with return code 7
> SIOCADDRT: File exists
> run-parts: /etc/network/if-up.d/addroutes exited with return code 7
> done.
> 
> Just wanted to give everyone a status and answer some questions about
> what works and what doesn't.
> 
> Larry
> 
