AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080228174339.2b1185d2@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<brian.stark@onstor.com>,<warren.gale@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E089F1902@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:46:05 -0800
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Brian Stark" <brian.stark@onstor.com>
Cc: "Warren Gale" <warren.gale@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: concrete info on CF status problem
Message-ID: <20080228174605.206a0a38@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E089F1902@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <20080225140859.55145d81@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E089F185F@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<20080228162754.3c0479e9@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E089F1902@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 16:51:10 -0800 "Brian Stark"
<brian.stark@onstor.com> wrote:

> No, I see nothing.  This is not a board problem -- the interrupt is
> firing and something is then reading the status reg in the 1520.  

That's OK, I recognize your denial and it's only human, after all.

> I've tried your old Rev 2 board, a Rev 3 board, and a Rev 4 board.
> Plus, I can show you the diffs in the netlists between Rev 2 - Rev 4,
> and there's nothing in the hardware that's changed with any of the
> connections between CF, 1520, and 1125.

What about the 1520 itself?  Different rev, different part no.,
different supplier, different version? Just because nothing changed in
the netlists doesn't rule out something not right with the way they were
built.  Or if we switched to a slightly different part that's RoHS
compatible or something.
  
> Like I said, I tried your old board and had no luck.  I used the same
> kernel on a new board.  I also tried the 1.0.2, 1.0.3, and 1.0.4
> PROMs. This is not a problem with the board or the PROM.

Those sound like bettin' words.  How much you care to risk?  Baby needs
a new pair of shoes.

> Your old board is connected as follows:
> 
> SSC console	10.1.1.100 2001
> Power 10.1.1.141, port .a2
> IP addr 10.1.1.125

OK, but do you have the CF card monkey tethered to the bench?  What's
the PROM command to get that little guy to pop a flash out/in?  ~:^)
