AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080312115259.5275c87f@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E08D2A586@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:53:39 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Jonathan Goldick" <jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 28290 for review
Message-ID: <20080312115339.0d652bcb@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E08D2A586@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <WEBMAILjSDWBerZhPfy000000e2@mail.onstor.com>
	<20080312110652.50651eae@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E08D2A586@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thanks.  I realize you're busy with actual important stuff, and I
apologize for intruding with crap like this.  'Preciate it.

On Wed, 12 Mar 2008 11:19:01 -0700 "Jonathan Goldick"
<jonathan.goldick@onstor.com> wrote:

> I'll give it a shot.  I've been too busy to talk to him but will do
> so.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2008 11:07 AM
> To: Jonathan Goldick
> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 28290 for review
> 
> This BS is really starting to piss me off.  I'm appealing the only
> person I can think of who might be able to get through to Max that
> there's going to be unpleasant consequences if he can't abide by the
> adopted conventions of the group.  Everyone else does, within human
> limits.  So can he.
> 
> I've been nice, I've been polite, I've ignored Max's many attempts to
> personalize the issue and his insults and all the rest.  I've tried to
> point out to him that he's never once made any substantive statement
> explaining why he refuses to do what he should; while I've clearly and
> calmly given him all the reasons why the practice is in place. In
> other words, I'm not taking the blame for his behavior.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> a
> 
> On 11 Mar 2008 10:45:01 -0700 Maxim Kozlovsky
> <maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com> wrote:
> 
> > Change 28290 by maximk@maximk-13 on 2008/03/11 10:41:46
> > 
> > 	   22746.
> > 	Save the request context in clientPrivate field of
> > filesystem read request instead of request and store the pointer to
> > request in the request context since the fs read request can
> > complete asynchronously. Initialize r_num_dcaches.
> > 	   Reviewed by jong.
> > 
> > Affected files ...
> > 
> > ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-dcache/dcache-api.c#33 edit
> > ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-dcache/dcache-api.h#18 edit
> > ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-dcache/dcache-rx.c#12 edit
> > 
> > 
> > http://liszt:1818/@md=d&cd=//depot/$c=G35@/28290?ac=10
