AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<paul.hammer@onstor.com>,<bob.miller@onstor.com>,<brian.stark@onstor.com>,<tim.gardner@onstor.com>,<jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E098A7030@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 21 Apr 2008 10:29:02 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Paul Hammer" <paul.hammer@onstor.com>
Cc: "Bob Miller" <bob.miller@onstor.com>, "Brian Stark"
 <brian.stark@onstor.com>, "Tim Gardner" <tim.gardner@onstor.com>, "Jonathan
 Goldick" <jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Coverity plug needs pulling
Message-ID: <20080421102902.20da4e39@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E098A7030@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E06CFF204@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E098A7030@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sat, 19 Apr 2008 12:33:03 -0700 "Paul Hammer"
<paul.hammer@onstor.com> wrote:

> Plug is in the process of being pulled. There will not be anymore HCL
> coded Coverity checkins.

Thank you.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Miller 
> Sent: 2008-04-18 14:22
> To: Andy Sharp; Paul Hammer; Brian Stark; Tim Gardner; Jonathan
> Goldick Subject: Re: Coverity plug needs pulling
> 
> I would like to see Coverity contiue to be used to test check ins. I
> agree with discontinuing it on everything else. 
> B
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp
> To: Bob Miller; Paul Hammer; Brian Stark; Tim Gardner; Jonathan
> Goldick Sent: Fri Apr 18 14:13:39 2008
> Subject: Coverity plug needs pulling
> 
> Dear Gang,
> 
> The time has come to suspend the Coverity work and release those
> resources.  The ratio of useful fixes to breakage/distruption/extra
> work is horrendous, and it is represents palpable but valueless
> risk to the Cougar project.  The money we are spending on the
> resources could be put to a much better use.
> 
> While those that might know tell me that, with some work, the
> Coverity program could eventually provide useful results, the
> resources to do that work are simply nowhere near available in these
> lean times, and won't be in the foreseeable future.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> a
> 
