AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080508145634.72edf276@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<amit.bothra@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E09338C33@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 8 May 2008 14:56:48 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Amit Bothra" <amit.bothra@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Mightydog Weekly Meeting Minutes
Message-ID: <20080508145648.19b82913@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E09338C33@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E09DF9D18@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E09338C33@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

It's been herky-jerky for about 30 minutes now, say, starting at around
2.30pm

On Thu, 8 May 2008 12:52:29 -0700 "Amit Bothra"
<amit.bothra@onstor.com> wrote:

> I am seeing the slowdown right now. Saving a file in "vi" is taking a
> few seconds.
> 
>  
> 
> Amit
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Paul Hammer 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 6:27 PM
> To: dl-Engineering
> Subject: FW: Mightydog Weekly Meeting Minutes
> 
>  
> 
> Hi All,
> 
>  
> 
> If you see the stall/slowdown on MD please let IT know ASAP.
> 
>  
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>  
> 
> -Paul
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: John Rogers 
> Sent: 2008-05-07 18:17
> To: Jobi Ariyamannil; dl-mightydog-alert
> Subject: RE: Mightydog Weekly Meeting Minutes
> 
>  
> 
> I haven't seen it myself for several days. It would be helpful If we
> could get people to report the issues, so we can look at the stats and
> traces from those times.
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: Jobi Ariyamannil 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 6:12 PM
> To: John Rogers; dl-mightydog-alert
> Subject: RE: Mightydog Weekly Meeting Minutes
> 
>  
> 
> Sorry that I could not attend the meeting.
> 
>  
> 
> The performance issue is still seen occasionally.
> 
> Some days it is very bad.
> 
>  
> 
> I think we can convert the filesystems immediately.
> 
>  
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Jobi
> 
>  
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> From: John Rogers 
> Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2008 4:54 PM
> To: dl-mightydog-alert
> Subject: Mightydog Weekly Meeting Minutes
> 
>  
> 
> Attendees: John Rogers, Brian Baker, Trung Truong, Raj Kumar, Chris
> Vandever, Sandrine Boulanger, Paul Hammer
> 
>  
> 
> Current Issues:
> 
>  
> 
> Performance Issues:
> 
>  The problem has not been seen, continued monitoring is required
> 
>  
> 
> Clustering Issues:
> 
>  The problem seems to be related to I/O from SSC CPU to flash disk
> during KPI collection at level 4. An alternative method for collecting
> KPI's is being worked up and will be tested before applying it to
> Mightydog.
> 
>  
> 
> Process Improvement:
> 
>  It seems that a smoother transition between assist site to case to
> defect could be attained by adding a CS person to the
> dl-mightydogalert team.
> 
>  
> 
> Storage Migration:
> 
>  All Storage Migration activities are on hold until performance issues
> are resolved.
> 
>  
> 
> Configuration improvements:
> 
> The most important improvement is converting the fs version to the
> latest.
> 
>  
> 
> Mightydog Monitoring Reports.
> 
>  We can leverage the uptime reports already being generated to get
> specific mightydog uptime.
> 
>  Need to summarize the data coming in this way:
> 
>             # reports :nagios alerts received for all tests
> 
>             # cases : cases opened by IT
> 
>             # defects
> 
>  
> 
> Action Items:
> 
> Raj to write up KPI collection improvement doc, QA to test it
> 
> Paul H to ping Paul N regarding CS addition to the dl
> 
>  
> 
> Open Questions:
> 
> Do we want to change the FS version before the Performance issue is
> resolve or after?
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
>  
> 
