AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080512210110.7f49197e@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<chris.vandever@onstor.com>,<manohar.divate@onstor.com>,<dl-Cougar@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E03E9A856@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 21:01:24 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Chris Vandever" <chris.vandever@onstor.com>
Cc: "Manohar Divate" <manohar.divate@onstor.com>, "dl-Cougar"
 <dl-Cougar@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: /etc/hosts
Message-ID: <20080512210124.197bf9f3@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E03E9A856@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <20080512195759.1d4b4841@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E03E9A856@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

You're probably right.  Methinks a bug lurks.

On Mon, 12 May 2008 20:03:45 -0700 "Chris Vandever"
<chris.vandever@onstor.com> wrote:

> In that case wouldn't g10r204 be correct?  That makes mores sense
> since it has neither those pesky ipv6 entries, nor the .sc1 oddity.
> 
> ChrisV
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:58 PM
> To: Chris Vandever
> Cc: Manohar Divate; dl-Cougar
> Subject: Re: /etc/hosts
> 
> OK, here's my reply, so only 10 more to go! ~:^) But you've probably
> been looking at this file a lot lately, so I won't dare correct.
> 
> sc1 only is not technically incorrect, but probably is in this case.
> 
> I thought we axed the ipv6 entries?
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 19:35:36 -0700 "Chris Vandever"
> <chris.vandever@onstor.com> wrote:
> 
> > I'm sure a dozen people will correct me, but my understanding is
> > that the first one (on g9r204) is the correct format.  I believe
> > the one on g10r204 is an older variant that should have been
> > overwritten on the last system upgrade.
> > 
> > I'm not sure about having only a .sc1 address, however.  I thought
> > it would be a .sc0 address for cougar.
> > 
> > [Ducking behind my shield now...]
> > 
> > ChrisV
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Manohar Divate 
> > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2008 7:26 PM
> > To: dl-Cougar
> > Subject: /etc/hosts
> > 
> > I see two different kind   of /etc/hosts entries  in a cluster
> > 
> > Is it oK or a concern :-)
> > 
> > 
> > g9r204:~# cat /etc/hosts
> > 127.0.0.1               localhost
> > 
> > # The following lines are desirable for IPv6 capable hosts
> > # (added automatically by netbase upgrade)
> > 
> > ::1     ip6-localhost ip6-loopback
> > fe00::0 ip6-localnet
> > ff00::0 ip6-mcastprefix
> > ff02::1 ip6-allnodes
> > ff02::2 ip6-allrouters
> > ff02::3 ip6-allhosts
> > 10.2.204.9              g9r204  g9r204.sc1
> > g9r204:~# nfxsh
> > 
> > Welcome to the ONStor NAS Gateway.
> > 
> > g9r204 diag> int show int
> > Interface  Table
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > Interface     Admin.     Operation  Mac Address         LPORT
> > -------------------------------------------------------------
> > sc0           UP         UP         0:7:34:7:52:0       sc0
> > sc1           DOWN       DOWN       0:7:34:7:52:1       sc1
> > 
> > g10r204:~# cat /etc/hosts
> > 127.0.0.1               localhost
> > 10.2.204.10 g10r204.sc0 g10r204
> > 10.2.204.20 g10r204.sc1 g10r204
> > g10r204:~# nfxsh -t
> > 
> > 
> > 
