AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080624161938.59276ccc@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#mh/Mailbox/perfarce	0	WEBMAILVtecHd0Y4WgH00002cb2@mail.onstor.com
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:20:40 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: Jonathan Goldick <jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 29796 for review
Message-ID: <20080624162040.6a048f99@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <WEBMAILVtecHd0Y4WgH00002cb2@mail.onstor.com>
References: <WEBMAILVtecHd0Y4WgH00002cb2@mail.onstor.com>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 20 Jun 2008 14:15:01 -0700 Maxim Kozlovsky
<maxim.kozlovsky@onstor.com> wrote:

> Change 29796 by maximk@maximk-13 on 2008/06/20 14:12:38
> 
> 	   24344 Do not allow creating of new ofh once the disconnect
> 	   has been initiated.
> 	   Reviewed by jong.
> 
> Affected files ...
> 
> ... //depot/dev/nfx-tree/code/sm-open/ofh-api.c#11 edit

I really wish there was the slightest bit of useable information in this
comment.  I also wish that you would review his comments; I believe we
are supposed to be doing that now.

I need to know if this should go into sub#28beta or not.  Any
information would be appreciated.