AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080626121045.5a3d5248@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<vikas.saini@onstor.com>,<raj.kumar@onstor.com>,<sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0AA0B26E@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:11:44 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Vikas Saini" <vikas.saini@onstor.com>
Cc: "Raj Kumar" <raj.kumar@onstor.com>, "Sandrine Boulanger"
 <sandrine.boulanger@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: testing of nightly build with bills changes
Message-ID: <20080626121144.005f29ad@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0AA0B26E@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <20080626113151.5829f102@ripper.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0AA0B258@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
	<BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0AA0B26E@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

OK, so SS is being used for the corruption testing, so I guess that two
birds can't be captured with that test.

I want something a little more stressful than the AT, which is really
just light weight smoke testing.  A single node with nfsperf test
running against a single volume for an hour or so.

Thanks,

a


On Thu, 26 Jun 2008 11:57:41 -0700 "Vikas Saini"
<vikas.saini@onstor.com> wrote:

> We can't use SS for that testing. It will take a couple of hours to
> upgrade SS. 
> 
> I will prefer to use some other for that testing.
> 
> I thought Nfsperftest is part of AT. So a couple of dd's with
> nfsperftest should be good enough to regress bill's code ? rest Bill
> should be able to give us more info on regression.

nfsperf test is not part of AT.

> 
> Thanks
> Vikas
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Raj Kumar 
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:48 AM
> To: Andy Sharp
> Cc: Vikas Saini; Sandrine Boulanger
> Subject: RE: testing of nightly build with bills changes
> 
> Andy,
> 
> Please work this through vikas. There are several other tests going on
> (including reproducing corruption issues). I need to know which one to
> drop.
> 
> Vikas, what next?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Sharp 
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 11:32 AM
> To: Raj Kumar
> Subject: testing of nightly build with bills changes
> 
> Hi Raj,
> 
> You probably don't need me to tell you this, but just to clarify, what
> I'm looking for as far as testing last night's nightly build with
> Bill's change is for you to do an hour or two of something more
> stressful than acceptance tests on the SCSI layer.  So even just
> running the nfsperf test in a way that simulates a dozen clients or so
> doing both reads and writes for an hour would be fine.
> 
> Let me know how it goes, and if no explosions occur, then we will
> create a beta submittal.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> a
