AF:
NF:0
PS:10
SRH:1
SFN:
DSR:
MID:<20080628164926.377a7ce8@ripper.onstor.net>
CFG:
PT:0
S:andy.sharp@onstor.com
RQ:
SSV:onstor-exch02.onstor.net
NSV:
SSH:
R:<ed.kwan@onstor.com>,<jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>
MAID:1
X-Sylpheed-Privacy-System:
X-Sylpheed-Sign:0
SCF:#mh/Mailbox/sent
RMID:#imap/andys@onstor.net@onstor-exch02.onstor.net/INBOX	0	BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0AAC5A5D@onstor-exch02.onstor.net
X-Sylpheed-End-Special-Headers: 1
Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:49:41 -0700
From: Andrew Sharp <andy.sharp@onstor.com>
To: "Ed Kwan" <ed.kwan@onstor.com>
Cc: Jonathan Goldick <jonathan.goldick@onstor.com>
Subject: Re: Escalation defect TED 24451
Message-ID: <20080628164941.1b4e03b7@ripper.onstor.net>
In-Reply-To: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0AAC5A5D@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
References: <BB375AF679D4A34E9CA8DFA650E2B04E0AAC5A5D@onstor-exch02.onstor.net>
Organization: Onstor
X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.6.0 (GTK+ 2.8.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 16:34:11 -0700 "Ed Kwan" <ed.kwan@onstor.com> wrote:

> Hi Andy,
> 
> Take a look at TED 24451 when you have a chance.  The code changes
> that caused this problem originated in the dev branch, so I believe
> Cougar has this issue also.  The "fix" that I've chosen for LSI and
> UIT is to back out the original NULL byte write optimization and the
> subsequent buffer leak fix.  You may want to talk to Jonathan and/or
> Max regarding a "real" fix for Cougar.

Hey Ed,

Thanks for bringing this to attention.  I read the notes for the
defect, and I don't get the proposed change.  If this is fixed in
3.2.0.6 why back out those changes? I seem to remember without those
changes other bad things happen in other work flows.

Cheers,

a
